Play List:

1. The Rath Boys

2. The Witchfinder

3. A Madcap Prince

4. Corinne

5. The Queen of Connaught

6. The Nine Days’ Queen

7. The Mormons

8. The Shadow of the Sword

9. Lucy Brandon

10. Storm-Beaten

11. Lady Clare

[Flowers of the Forest]

12. A Sailor and His Lass

13. Bachelors

14. Constance

15. Lottie

16. Agnes

17. Alone in London

18. Sophia

19. Fascination

20. The Blue Bells of Scotland

21. Partners

22. Joseph’s Sweetheart

23. That Doctor Cupid

24. Angelina!

25. The Old Home

26. A Man’s Shadow

27. Theodora

28. Man and the Woman

29. Clarissa

30. Miss Tomboy

31. The Bride of Love

32. Sweet Nancy

33. The English Rose

34. The Struggle for Life

35. The Sixth Commandment

36. Marmion

37. The Gifted Lady

38. The Trumpet Call

39. Squire Kate

40. The White Rose

41. The Lights of Home

42. The Black Domino

43. The Piper of Hamelin

44. The Charlatan

45. Dick Sheridan

46. A Society Butterfly

47. Lady Gladys

48. The Strange Adventures of Miss Brown

49. The Romance of the Shopwalker

50. The Wanderer from Venus

51. The Mariners of England

52. Two Little Maids from School

53. When Knights Were Bold


Short Plays

Other Plays

Buchanan’s Theatrical Ventures in America

Poetry Readings





The Fleshly School Controversy
Buchanan and the Press
Buchanan and the Law

The Critical Response
Harriett Jay

Site Diary
Site Search



The final performance of Alone in London at the Olympic Theatre, London took place on Saturday, 20th February 1886 and the company then commenced their provincial tour on Monday, 22nd February. Although Alone in London was occasionally revived in London, its great financial success (referred to by both Miss Jay and Henry Murray) relied more on provincial audiences (we were never the sophisticates). The review in The Guardian from July 1895 mentions 5,000 performances. The review in The Scotsman from April 1897 remarks: “The play has been touring for eleven  years, and still holds the play-going public.” In June, 1898 the “twelfth year of tour ... with Mr. Elliston’s No. 1 Co., under the direction of Mr. Warwick Major” commenced at the Theatre Royal, Hanley (one of the six towns of the Potteries, a stone’s throw from Buchanan’s birthplace). And The Guardian review of May 1900 includes the following: “And yet the piece is not only good of its kind, but it has now for fourteen years been accounted almost a classic in this curious domain of melodrama.” The following reviews stretch from 1886 to 1910, with a note about the 1915 film version and a final mention of the play (and Warwick Major) from 1922.



The Liverpool Mercury (24 February, 1886)


     “Alone in London,” a new play, swift, vigorous, of highly ingenious structure, with two or three incidents of the most striking and effective description, was produced for the first time before a Liverpool audience at the Alexandra Theatre, on Monday. It is the work of Mr. Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay; and if by the cordiality of its reception here we may judge, the play has a successful provincial career awaiting it. But recommendations of the joint production have not been wanting. The fact that it was attended with success throughout a lengthy American tour, and that it outlived a metropolitan first night in the face of the “organised opposition” of which we heard so much at the time, and continued to hold the stage there for six months, is, to say the least, some guarantee of its real worth. The plot is briefly this. Annie Meadows, a young woman in humble life, living in Suffolk, becomes attached to a Richard Redcliffe, a swell mobsman from London, though she has a kind of affection for a neighbour of means, by name John Biddlecomb. Annie becomes the wife of the Londoner, and is afterwards known in the play as Nan. Then she discovers the thieving character to which she has wedded herself. She is compelled to live in a low lodging house in Drury-lane while she seeks her own livelihood, and also that of her son, by selling flowers, in the neighbourhood of Westminster Bridge. She and her child are here befriended by a Mr. Burnaby, a banker, and saved from the dreadful existence of a life on the streets. Her husband and his accomplices, Spriggins and Jenkinson, are subsequently borne down in an attempt to rob the Burnaby bank. The play is a melodrama of the old-fashioned type with an element of the modern “slumming” annexed. In several places the plot is worked out with marvellous ingenuity and subtlety. There are incidents no doubt a little improbable. It is improbable, for instance, that an adventurer like Redcliffe could have a wife living “in the gutter” of a thieves’ kitchen in Drury-lane. Though not impossible, it is improbable, also, that the husband, after serving his term of imprisonment, which ensues immediately after the Westminster Bridge scene, should encounter his wife under such curious conditions in the country house of the Burnabys, at Thames Ditton. But, granting the improbability of these incidents, nothing could possible be more telling than the situations which the authors have got out of them. The two great incidents in the play occur in the two last acts. The first is that of the lamp at the window of Nan’s lodgings, which her villanous husband and his “friends” take away, and so bring down their own detection. The second is the incident where the child is passed through the bars of the bank window out to the arms of the scoundrel father into those of his mother. For a moment it may be thought that this incident is copied from “Oliver Twist;” but while it will be remembered that in the story by Dickens a child is passed by burglars through a window, the resemblance between the two works ceases, the incident in the play being entirely different in intention and psychology. It is not too much to say that there is hardly anything in modern drama more affecting than this incident. The melodrama is divided into a prologue and four acts. The prologue is pretty, but nothing more. The first act is full of vigour, while the second act is highly dramatic. The third and fourth acts are full of passion. Plays usually fail at this point, but here the interest is kept up to the very last line. Miss Harriett Jay’s Nan, a pathetic character, is full of true womanliness. Her isolation, her loneliness in London, her love for her child, and even her devotion to the scoundrel husband, who has so cruelly deceived her, is keenly felt by the hearer. But Miss Jay is at her best in the last scenes of the third act, when she appropriates the forged bill; and at last, in defying her husband, her acting is tragic and thrillingly effective. Mr. Herbert Standing’s Richard Redcliffe was a clever piece of acting throughout. Mr. Percy Bell’s Jenkinson, the thief and philosopher, is full of humour; and Mr. Langley Russell as Spriggins presents an exceedingly clever portraiture, while Mr. W. H. Denny as Charlie Johnson, the professional star vocalist, is full of rollicking humour. Gipsy Tom, the waif and stray, is impersonated by Miss Louisa Gourlay with much ability. “Alone in London,” in a word, is not a play of a high type, and not the sort of one we should have expected from the author of “The Earthquake,” but its story is full of moving and stirring incidents, which in their theatrical representation can never fail to take effect.



The Cheltenham Chronicle (27 February, 1886 - p.8)

     Miss Harriet Jay, who was to have gone to Liverpool with Mr Buchanan’s play of “Alone in London,” has sprained her ancle. A curious incident ensued. Her under-study took her place at rehearsal, and did extremely well; but, next day she, too, was missing, with a doctor’s certificate that rehearsing without a book had so affected her brain that it would be unsafe for her to act for the present.
     A correspondent in the City Press writes that during an experience of over forty years he has never known a week in which his business receipts were smaller than last week—a result due, in his opinion, to the fog, frost and riots.



The Pall Mall Gazette (2 March, 1886 - p.7)


     Miss Amy Roselle has brought an action for slander against Mr. Robert Buchanan, based upon words alleged to have been uttered by him in connection with her performances at the Olympic Theatre to the effect that Miss Roselle had purposely cut out part of a scene with Miss Jay, and had walked off the stage, with the intention of insulting her. In the action the plaintiff claimed £500 as damages. The defendant obtained from Mr. Justice Field in Chambers an order directing the plaintiff to disclose the names of the persons to whom the slander was uttered; but against this decision Miss Amy Roselle yesterday appealed to Justices Grove and Stephen, who, however, confirmed the order.

[Note: More details about this court case are available in Buchanan and the Law.]



The Era (20 March, 1886)

     “ALONE IN LONDON,” with Miss Harriett Jay and the London company, is having a successful career in the provinces. The number two rights of this drama, excluding the larger towns, have been secured for a large sum by Mr Elliston, the enterprising manager of the Theatre Royal, Bolton, who will immediately organise a company for its adequate production.



     PRINCE OF WALES’S THEATRE.—Proprietors, Messrs J. Rodgers and Son; Acting-Manager, Mr C. M. Appleby.— The drama by Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay, entitled Alone in London, has occupied the boards of the Prince of Wales’s Theatre during the past week. The acting was uniformly good, and especial praise is due to Miss Harriett Jay’s personation of the much-suffering heroine Annie Meadows. It was noticeable for its alternate touches of pathos and tenderness, and for the power which Miss Jay displayed of putting herself in sympathy with her audience. Her performance was one of the best of its kind that has been seen at the Prince of Wales’s Theatre for a very long time. No wonder, therefore, that it was very enthusiastically received. Mr Herbert Standing as the villain, Richard Redcliffe, had an exceedingly heavy and exacting part to play, but acquitted himself with very great credit. Miss Louisa Gourlay’s impersonation of Gipsy Tom, the waif, will linger long in the recollection of those who saw it. Mr Arthur Lyle gave a manly and dignified rendering of John Biddlecomb, and Mr Percy Bell as Jenkinson, the thief and philosopher, supplied a fine bit of character acting. All the other parts were well sustained, and the staging of the piece was all that could be desired.



The Era (3 April, 1886)


     THEATRE ROYAL.—Manager, Mr Arthur Grimmett.—The new melodrama Alone in London has been presented here during the week by Miss Harriett Jay’s specially organised company. The drama has drawn large and enthusiastic audiences. Miss Jay as the heroine gives a very sympathetic rendering of a difficult rôle, and Miss E. Brunton as Biddy Maloney gives a perfect character sketch. Miss Louisa Gourlay as the Waif deserves great praise for her earnest acting, and Mesdames Adah Cox and Nellie Palmer render efficient aid in small but important rôles. Mr Arthur Lyle made a first appearance here as John Biddlecomb, and at once won the sympathies of the audience by his manly, forcible acting; Mr Herbert Standing gives a most artistic realisation of Redcliffe; Mr Percy Bell made a great deal of Jenkinson; and Mr W. H. Denny deserves equal praise for a humorous bit of acting as Charlie Johnson. Messrs Fred. Harland, Russell, and Ramsay complete a large and very satisfactory cast. Special attention is paid to the mounting of the piece, the various sets being wonderfully realistic.


[Notice in The Era (3 April, 1886 - p.4).]


The Era (17 April, 1886)


     PRINCES’S THEATRE.—Lessee, Mr T. Sergenson.—Alone in London was produced hereon Monday evening last by a well-organised company, under the direction of Miss Harriet Jay. The acting of Miss Jay as the suffering wife, Nan Redclyffe, contributes materially to the success of the drama, and Mr Herbert Standing is to be congratulated on a very forcible performance of the rascally adventurer, Redclyffe. Miss Louisa Gourlay’s impersonation of the poor waif, Tom, is full of genuine feeling, and cleverly sustained. A good deal of natural earnestness of the “rugged” order marks Mr Arthur Lyle’s countryman, John Biddlecombe. Mr Percy Bell’s performance of Jenkinson, the philosophical thief, is one of the successes of the play, which is made most enjoyable by the humorous acting of Mr W. H. Denny as the Bohemian, Charlie Johnson. The rest of the numerous characters are in good hands, and the piece is a decided success here.


[Advert for the first Miller and Elliston provincial tour of Alone in London from The Era (24 April, 1886 - p.4).]


The Era (22 May, 1886 - p.18)


     THEATRE ROYAL.—Lessees, Messrs Howard and Wyndham; Acting-Manager, Mr B. Phillips.—On Monday evening at this theatre, before a crowded and enthusiastic audience, Alone in London was produced for the first time in Newcastle with complete success. Miss Harriet Jay is entitled to special praise for the earnest and painstaking manner in which she sustains the part of the heroine, Annie Meadows. A clever bit of character acting is the John Biddlecomb of Mr Arthur Lyle, and the impersonation of Richard Redcliffe by Mr Herbert Standing is most realistic. Mr Langley Russell enacts the part of Spriggins in a highly satisfactory manner, and Mr Percy Bell is equally effective as Jenkinson. Mr W. H. Denny elicits deserved applause for his amusing portrayal of Charlie Johnson. Liz Jenkinson is cleverly enacted by Miss Nellie Palmer. Miss Louisa Gourlay merits high praise for her natural and truthful acting as the London street Arab Tom Chickweed, and Miss E. Brunton sustains the role of Miss Moloney in a praiseworthy manner. The scenes, the Inventories at Kensington and the Houses of Parliament by night are most effective.



The Era (29 May, 1886 - p.18)


     THE GRAND THEATRE.—Lessee, Mr Wilson Barrett; Acting-Manager, Mr Lee Anderson.—After two weeks of comic opera, sensational drama, as represented by Miss Harriet Jay and her company in Alone in London, now reigns supreme here. Miss Jay as the much-tried wife and Mr Herbert Standing as her infamous husband acted well, and elicited hearty applause and recalls after each act, a mark of favour likewise bestowed on Mr Arthur Lyle, who played John Biddlecomb, Miss Louisa Gourlay, the waif, and Mr W. H. Gilbert, who was capital as Jenkinson. Miss Nellie Palmer, Liz Jenkinson, and Mr W. H. Denny as Liz’s husband displayed comic ability, and the parts of Mr Burnaby and Walter were well played by Messrs Fred. Harland and Nelson Ramsay. The scenery, some of which the company carry with them, elicited applause, notably, the scene representing Westminster-bridge, with a steam-roller at work, and the Houses of Parliament, the Inventories, and the great sensational scene of the drama, the Old Sluice House.



The Era (7 August, 1886)


     THEATRE ROYAL.—Lessee and Manager, Mr J. R. Newcombe; Acting-Manager, Mr F. Kilpack.—Lost in London was the Bank Holiday attraction here on Monday night, and, with the stirring action of this very interesting drama and clever and complicated scenery, proved a most acceptable entertainment to the patrons of the house. The theatre was crowded to excess, and Miss Harriet Jay, who impersonates the heroine Nan, the Flower Girl, and who has had a share in the composition of the play, was at once made a warm favourite. She is very well supported by the other principal characters, notably by Miss Louisa Gourlay, whose acting of Gipsy Tom is both picturesque and effective; and the lady, with Miss Jay, secured the applause of the audience in all their best scenes. The rascally Richard Redcliffe is powerfully delineated by Mr Clarence J. Hague, and the other shady characters in the piece, such as Spriggins and Jenkinson, find careful representatives in Mr Langley Russell and Mr Percy Bell. Miss Nellie Palmer and Mr Arthur McEwen supply the low comedy element as Liz Jenkinson and Charlie Johnson, and the upper strata people, such as Mr Burnaby, Walter, and Ruth Clifden, are played in the most natural manner by Mr Fred. Harland, Mr Edward Coventry, and Miss Adah Cox.



The Era (14 August, 1886)

     MR EDITOR.—Sir,—In your notice of Alone in London last week at Plymouth, you give Miss Harriet Jay a very excellent notice for her impersonation of the heroine, Annie Meadows, whereas the part was played by Miss Alice Yorke. I am, Sir, yours faithfully,
                                                               GILBERT YORKE.
     55, Hilldrop-crescent, Camden-road, N.W.          August 12th, 1886.



     MESSRS WYNN MILLER and J. F. Elliston’s original Alone in London company commenced their autumn tour last week at Plymouth, paying return visits to the principal towns. Miss Alice Yorke now replaces Miss Harriet Jay as the heroine, Annie Meadows.



The Era (21 August, 1886)



. . .

     A DRAMA entitled Les Nuits de Londres (The Nights of London), drawn from Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay’s Alone in London, by MM. William Busnach and Pierre Decourcelle, has been accepted for the Ambigu by M. Rochard.


[Note: So far, I have been unable to find any record of a French production of Alone in London.]



The Era (4 September, 1886 - p.16)


     THEATRE ROYAL.—Lessee, Mr Jas. H. Elphinstone; Acting-Manager, Mr Chas. G. Elphinstone.—Crowded audiences have visited Mr Elphinstone’s house during the week to witness the first production in the Potteries of Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay’s drama Alone in London, which has been received with considerable favour. Miss May Holt presented us with a touching and artistic impersonation of Tom Chickweed, and the Annie Meadows of Miss Grace Balmain is especially worthy of commendation. Mr Harrington Reynolds was efficient as the villain Richard Redcliffe. Mr Lonnen Meadows lent valuable aid as Jenkinson, and Mr Magill Martyn acted with care and discrimination as the rustic lover John Biddlecomb.



The Morning Post (27 September, 1886 - p.3)

     Sir Randal Roberts’s drama, “Parted,” written expressly for Mrs. Boucicault, is in the course of rehearsal at the Olympic Theatre, which is reported to have been taken on lease by Mr. Robert Buchanan; but this is emphatically denied by the novelist. Mrs. Conover, however, announces that her connection with the house ceases this month, and she goes on tour with her representation of Lady Macbeth.



The Aberdeen Journal (1 October, 1886 - p.5)

     Yet another American invasion. The Olympic Theatre has been taken by a New York actress, Miss Agnes Hawthorne, for a term of six months. This lady is desirous of displaying in London her powers as an emotional actress. She will make her debut in “The Governess,” otherwise “Miss Multon,” a doleful drama of the East Lynne type, dear to Transatlantic actresses of the Clara Morris and Margaret Mathers school. With Miss Hawthorne there will be associated the clever ingenue, Miss Lydia Cowell. Mrs Conover, whose luckless production of “Macbeth” must have bowed her haughty spirit, has also consented to be “understudy” to the American, who brings over her own stage manager. The house in Wych Street has not been very successful of late, and even Mr Robert Buchanan fought shy of becoming its lessee. But the temporary ill-luck which has overtaken the Olympic is following several other establishments of the kind in the Metropolis. Those which are really paying well are to be counted upon the fingers of one hand. The number of disengaged actors may soon call for the opening of a “fund for the relief of distressed mummers.” In one sense therefore Miss Hawthorne’s enterprise should prove a boon and a blessing.

[Note: I have not come across “Miss Agnes Hawthorne”, but Grace Hawthorne (who would later engage Buchanan to adapt Sardou’s Théodora) sailed from New York on 21st August, 1886, according to this piece in the Boston Evening Transcript, which also mentions her leasing the Olympic Theatre, so I assume the ‘Agnes’ is a mistake.]


[Advert from The Stage (11 March, 1887 - p.12).]


The Era (19 March, 1887)

On Monday, March 14th, 1887, the Drama,
by Robert Buchanan and Harriet Jay,

John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr FELIX PITT
Annie Meadows      ...    ...    Miss ETHEL ARDEN
Jack Woods             ...     ...     Mr F. BETHSON
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr A. C. LILLY
Spriggins                  ...     ...     Mr CHARLES REEVES
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr J. A. HOWELL
Mr Burnaby             ...     ...     Mr GEORGE YATES
Walter Burnaby       ...    ...    Mr W. GRANVILLE
Ruth Clifden             ...     ...     Miss GRACE HOPE
Liz Jenkinson          ...    ...    Miss HELENA LISLE
Charlie Johnson      ...    ...    Mr JAMES STEVENSON
Little Paul                ...    ...    Little JULIA REEVES
Tom Chickweed      ...     ...     Miss KATIE BARRY
Mrs Moloney          ...    ...    Miss HARRIET CLIFTON
Blind Billy                ...     ...     Mr MILO BLYDE
The “Lame Duck”    ...     ...     Mr SPARKES
Robert                     ...     ...     Mr HELLER
Inspector of Police  ...    ...    Mr BENSON
“Jim, the Larker”      ...     ...     Mr J. CLARK
Isaacs                     ...    ...    Mr HARDING
David                      ...    ...    Mr GODFREY
Susan                      ...    ...    Miss E. MOODY

     Mr Morris Abrahams, we believe, holds the London rights for the representation of the above-named piece, and it is no matter for wonder that he has taken advantage of the very earliest opportunity to present it to his multitudinous patrons. Without drawing invidious comparisons or entering upon what, in spite of classical authority, may be called the disputatious question of taste, it must be said that Alone in London is far more suited for a theatre at the East than for one at the West, and if proof of this were needed it would be found in the absorbed interest and the great enthusiasm with which the piece has been received by Mr Abrahams’ supporters. The drama, it will be remembered, was originally produced at the Olympic in November, 1885, and since then it has met with favour from provincial playgoers. It is the boast of the Pavilion management that the drama is there produced with all the original mechanical effects and appointments on one of the largest and most complete stages in Great Britain, the new machinery recently completed being brought into requisition to heighten the realism and to impress the spectator. This boast, we may say, is fully  justified, and when it is recommended that all should see the sudden conversion of the old house at Rotherhithe to the scene of the sluice house and the opening of the flood gates, and the gardens of the “Inventories” with its various coloured lights, we can warmly endorse the recommendation, and can readily accept the declaration that they form pictures hitherto unsurpassed at this theatre. We may add that they reflect great credit, not only on the scenic artist and the machinist, but upon Mr Isaac Cohen, who by general consent is one of the ablest stage-managers in the country. The acting all round has been excellent. The heroine, Annie Meadows, has been very sympathetically played by Miss Ethel Arden, who has contrived to move all hearts to pity, while execration has been the lot of Richard Redcliffe, the villain, as represented by Mr A. C. Lilly. Comic rascality has been well depicted by Messrs Howell and Reeves as respectively Jenkinson and Spriggins, and the waif Tom Chickweed has been splendidly represented by Miss Katie Barry, a young actress, who has been the recipient of well-deserved plaudits. The eccentricities of Charlie Johnson, the peripatetic performer, have been humorously brought out by Mr J. Stevenson. Mr Felix Pitt has won general admiration for his spirited interpretation of the part of the wealthy miller, John Biddlecombe, and Miss Harriet Clifton as Mrs Maloney, with the nimble tongue, and Miss Helena Lisle as Liz Jenkinson are entitled to special mention for good work done.



The Era (7 May, 1887)

On Saturday, April 30th, for the First Time at this Theatre,
the Drama, in Five Acts,
by Robert Buchanan and Harriet Jay, entitled


John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr HENRY GASCOIGNE
Jack Woods             ...     ...     Mr J. DELMAGE
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr DAVID HONEYSETT
Gipsy Tom                ...     ...     Miss EMMA STOCKLEY
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr JOHN HENDERSON
Annie Meadows      ...    ...    Mrs HENRY GASCOIGNE


Mr Burnaby             ...     ...     Mr EDWARD LEIGH
Walter Burnaby       ...    ...    Mr EDWIN J. WILDE
Ruth Clifden             ...     ...     Miss ELLEN RUTLAND
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr DAVID HONEYSETT
Spriggins                  ...     ...     Mr WILLIAM GOODWIN
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr JOHN HENDERSON
Liz Jenkinson          ...    ...    Miss LOUISE MANVERS
John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr HENRY GASCOIGNE
Charlie Johnson      ...    ...    Mr CHARLES R. STONE
Nan                        ...    ...    Mrs HENRY GASCOIGNE
Little Paul                ...    ...    Miss MILLY HENDERSON
Tom Chickweed      ...    ...    Miss EMMA STOCKLEY
Mrs Maloney          ...    ...    Miss CLARA ROSE
The “Lame Duck”    ...     ...     Mr CLARKE
Robert                     ...     ...     Mr UNDERWOOD
Inspector of Police  ...    ...    Mr G. REDWOOD
Jim                          ...    ...    Mr LEONARD ROBSON
Isaacs                     ...    ...    Mr VOWLES
David                      ...    ...    Mr JOSEPHS
Susan                      ...    ...    Miss LOUISA BARRY

     The production of so heavy a piece as Mr Buchanan’s and Miss Harriett Jay’s Olympic drama on Saturday evening at the Church-street house amply testifies to the energy and ability with which Mr Henry Gascoigne is carrying on that old- established theatre. There can be no doubt that the drama possesses situations and incidents thoroughly to the tastes of popular audiences, and its success was never for a moment in doubt on Saturday evening. The enthusiasm over the sluice scene, and the rescue of the heroine from her perilous position, will no doubt be greater when the property waves are not in too great a hurry to “agitate;” but, with the exception of one or two little contretemps inseparable from a first night performance, Alone in London went smoothly enough, and unmistakably got hold of the sympathies of those in front, who can always be relied on to appreciate effect, without troubling themselves as to cause. Several additions and alterations had been made in Mr Gascoigne’s company, with a view to the adequate representation of the drama, and, as a whole, they acquitted themselves with undeniable ability of their several tasks. Mr David Honeysett exhibited a determination and vigour in his career of wrongdoing and heartless cruelty as Richard Redcliff that resulted in howling indignation being thundered forth with unanimity from all parts of the house. The Eliah Coombe-like Jenkinson senior, thief and philosopher, had every justice done to his comic scoundrelism by Mr John Henderson, who, while his dramatic deeds were deprecated, caused considerable laughter by his unctuous and humorous manner. Another comic character, whose popularity became very great, was Mrs Maloney, the benevolent Irishwoman and vendor of the refreshing orange, and Miss Clara Rose’s clever acting is entitled to the very highest praise for the admirable way she played the character. Miss Emma Stockley realised with pathetic force the unhappy, but ever-hopeful waif, Tom Chickweed; Miss Louise Manvers brought unquestionable comic ability to bear upon the part of Liz Jenkinson, the wife of the humble “perfesshonal,” Charlie Johnson, enacted with much humour by Mr Charles R. Stone. Mrs Gascoigne came with credit through the trying part of Nan, though this lady’s depiction of anguish is noisy rather than heart-searching; and Mr Gascoigne was a forcible John Biddlecombe, though his accent was more that of Lancashire than of Suffolk. A very praiseworthy piece of acting can be set down to Mr Edward Leigh as the benevolent Mr Burnaby, and a word of praise may be given to Mr Edwin Wilde as Walter Burnaby. Mr William Goodwin made a fairly good Spriggins, but did not sound the possibilities of the part, and other rôles were entrusted to Miss Ellen Rutland, Miss Milly Henderson, a promising child; Messrs James Delmage, Clarke, Underwood, G. Redwood, Leonard Robson, Vowles, Josephs, and Miss Louisa Barry. The perspective of the Westminster Bridge set was exceedingly fine, and no pains had been spared to mount the drama adequately. Alone in London was produced by arrangement with Mr Morris Abrahams, who has purchased the London rights of representation.



The Otago Witness (New Zealand) (20 May, 1887 - p.28)



     Cold and rainy weather is the regular bill of fare now, and we have the cheering prospect of a long and dreary winter. As I write it is raining with a steady and singlehearted earnestness of purpose which will materially swell the tram receipts this night. There is no mistake about our weather, it is not given to deceit. When it rains you know it; and when it is hot, it just boils. We have the most guileless weather under the sun; and like guileless people it is generally looked upon with suspicion and reproach.
     “A Run of Luck” is now in the decline of its days, and will not be played after Friday next. The following Saturday will witness the production of a new drama, “Alone in London,” written by Robert Buchanan and Harriet Jay, both of whom have achieved fame as novelists. The drama, which is in the good old five acts, has been highly successful in England and America. Five-act dramas are the admiration of the bar owners at the theatres, it wants a big effort to get comfortably drunk during three intervals. I fail to see why bars should be attached to theatres at all. They are an inducement to drink to many who would not walk 10 yards outside the theatre for it. Many a man goes home drunk, or nearly so, simply through the proximity of the bars, and that vile colonial custom of “shouting,” a custom which should be stamped out as soon as possible. Why should it be necessary for every man who meets you to insist on you taking a drink, and to expect you to stand one in return? You may require one drink, but you must take two, or get a colossal reputation for meanness. This appears to be degenerating into a temperance lecture, so blow the whistle, and off we go again.



The Otago Witness (New Zealand) (27 May, 1887 - p.28)



     A cold, rainy, unpleasant Saturday ushered in the new pieces at the various theatres. “Alone in London” was the principal attraction of the evening, the Theatre Royal being crowded to the doors. This drama, the joint work of Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay, both known in the literary world of London, was originally produced at the Olympic Theatre on November 2, 1885, and was only a partial success. It is somewhat too wordy, and the action drags at times in consequence. Five solid acts of sensation were doled out to us, the performance not concluding till close upon 12. The plot is somewhat difficult to boil down to an understandable resume without the sacrifice of much space, but I will make the best effort I can. Annie Meadows (Miss Kate Bishop) is the unsuspecting heroine, who is loved by a worthy miller, John Biddlecomb by name (Mr W. Howe), and Richard Redcliffe (Mr H. Flemming), a very remarkable scoundrel. She marries the villain, as a matter of course, and has an all-round bad time. We find her after six years have passed, with a basket of flowers and a son on Westminster bridge, and at once know what has happened. Her husband ill-treats her, and lives upon her earnings. He is also the cheerful president of a gang of thieves, and one of Annie’s greatest fears is that her son will be brought up to the profession. A charitable banker, who wanders round London by night giving poor people £5 notes, Mr Barnaby (Mr A. Glover), befriends her, and the money is at once seized by the brutal husband. Annie has another protector in Gipsy Tom (Miss Kate Douglas), who gets Redcliffe arrested on a charge of forgery. The Barnabys take Annie into their service, but the husband returns from imprisonment and causes her dismissal. Redcliffe then tries to carry off the child, and, to facilitate matters, ties the mother up to the old sluicegate, where she can comfortably drown when the water rises. Her old lover, the miller, manages, however, to be handy, and rescues her just in time for her to rush to Barnaby’s bank and prevent a burglary planned by her husband. Redcliffe attempts to shoot his wife as a solatium for his failure, and gets stabbed by Gipsy Tom, who is always on hand when he is wanted. The main share of the work falls upon Miss Kate Bishop, who acted in her usual effective manner. Mr Flemming as Redcliffe earned the hearty contempt of the gallery, and is, doubtless, proud of it. Mr Bland Holt as Jenkinson a minor villain, kept the drama from a too dreadful depth of melancholy. The scenery deserves every praise, a view of Westminster Bridge being singled out for particular applause. The mechanical work is very heavy in this drama, the last act having five changes of scene. Pressure of other news prevents my going any further into the details this week.



The Stage (10 June, 1887 - p.13)

     On Tuesday in the Queen’s Bench Division the Amy Roselle v. Robert Buchanan alleged slander case came on for hearing. The plaintiff’s counsel, however, stated that the defendant had withdrawn all the statements complained of and had made an apology which was satisfactory, and had, moreover, paid all costs. In these circumstances he asked permission to withdraw the charge. This was granted, and the case came to a satisfactory conclusion.



The Stage (1 July, 1887 - p.13)

     At the Theatre Royal, Melbourne, Mr. Bland Holt has produced Alone in London, the entire colonial rights of which he has secured from Mr. Robert Buchanan and Miss Henrietta Jay. The drama has been very elaborately produced, every scene having (in the phraseology of the bills) been “idealised” by Mr. George Gordon. The cast includes Messrs. Walter Howe, Herbert Flemming, J. Wiseman, E. Ryan, A. Glover, E. Coventry (who was the original exponent of the character at the Olympic), and Bland Holt, and Misses Kate Bishop, Kate Douglas, and Mabel Russell, and Mrs. Walter Hill.



The Era (20 August, 1887 - p.13)


     HER MAJESTY’S THEATRE.—Lessee, Mr W. McFarland; General Manager, Mr John Cavanah.—Mr John Wainwright and his company had a most successful week here with Drink and Faust, and now we have the Buchanan and Jay realistic Alone in London drawing large pit and gallery audiences. The striking feature of the piece lies in its elaborate mechanical stage settings effected in sight of the spectators. In the way of plot the drama does not bring us anything novel, but it is certainly a fresh sensation to northern folks to find Mr Robert Buchanan the author of certain of the characters, the style of dialogue, and the “business” presented in Alone in London. Seeing this weary, wire-drawn piece, one sighs for an hour of the charming Sophia again. The principal parts are sustained by Misses Lydia Lillian, Louisa Gourlay, and Bessie Foote; Messrs W. H. Brougham, Fred Dobell, Percy Bell, and F. Wilberforce. The drama is very well acted all round, and has given great satisfaction to the popular portions of the theatre.



The New York Times (4 September, 1887)


     An amusing instance of the susceptibility of modern authors to the charge of plagiarism has come to light in London, England. F. Scudamore, author of the play “First Class,” having quite recently seen Robert Buchanan’s “Alone in  London,” was staggered by the discovery that the motive of the former drama is throughout almost the same as that of the latter, with the addition that in Scudamore’s play of “Rags and Bones”—which sounds over here like the title of a drama produced long before “Alone in London”—a poor boy, Jerry Twaddle, who is a dealer in rags and bones, is pursued by village workmen who seek to rob him, while in “Alone in London” a poor boy, Tom Chickweed, a dealer in chickweed and groundsel, is also chased by village workmen. In both plays the poor boy is protected by the hero, and in both also the poor boy is enacted by a female. In “Alone in London” a leading character saves the life of a young man in a boating accident thus becomes acquainted with an heiress, and seeks to win her, although he has a wife, whom he tries to get rid of. In “First Class” a leading character saves an heiress in a railway accident and becomes her lover, although he has a mistress, whom he tries to get rid of. Both these leading characters are associated with a scoundrel named Dan, and both plan a robbery. In “First Class” Dan dresses his daughter up as a boy in order to drop her through the skylight to let in the thieves, and in “Alone in London” the villainous leading character drops his own son through the skylight for the same purpose. Mr. Scudamore had never seen “Alone in London” before he had booked “First Class,” and is quite willing to believe, as he himself is “only an obscure provincial author,” that Mr. Buchanan has never seen either “First Class” or “Rags and Bones.” Assuming that neither could have availed himself of the same source as the other, these coincidences serve strikingly to show that the opportunities for original work on the part of the dramatist are “growing smaller by degrees and beautifully less.”



The Evening Post (Wellington, New Zealand) (6 December, 1887 - p.2)

Mr. Bland Holt’s Dramatic Season.


     The name of Bland Holt is inseparably connected in New Zealand with dramatic sensationalism in its fullest development, and it is therefore not surprising that Mr. Holt and his company should have been accorded a most hearty reception at the Opera House last night on his reappearance after several years’ absence from the colony. The stalls, pit, and uppor circle were crowded almost to discomfort, and the dress circle was well filled. “Alone in London,” which was selected as the opening piece, contains sensation enough to gratify the most ardent lover of that class of play, and is presented to the public with an evenness of acting and perfectness in mounting such as are not often witnessed even in Wellington. The scenery and mechanical effects are indeed excellent. The view of the grounds connected with the Colinderies, brilliantly lighted up, with pleasure-seekers passing to and fro, that of Westminster Bridge and the Houses of Parliament by night, with wandering minstrels and other loiterers being “moved on” by the dutiful policemen, and steamboats plying on the river, were capital glimpses of London life and scenery. The climax of interest is, however, reached in the third act, where the heroine is tied by her brutal husband in the sluice channel, and the floodgates are opened to allow the water to pour upon her, until she is rescued from her perilous position by her faithful country lover. The raging flood is capitally represented, and last night this scene worked the audience up to the highest possible pitch of excitement and admiration. Turning to the characters in the play, Mr. Holt appeared as Jenkinson, one of those individuals, so well portrayed by Dickens, who live by their wits, and resort to all kinds of shifts to gain a livelihood. The part is invested with an immense amount ot low comedy humour, to which Mr. Holt gave the fullest effect without at any time falling into exaggeration. Mrs. Holt, who is newly introduced to Wellington play-goers, gave an engaging portrait of the character of Annie Meadows, heroine of the piece, in her various changes of fortune—first as an innocent country girl, and afterwards in her squalid London life, selling flowers to get money for her unprincipled husband to squander. The part is an extremely trying one, and was played with natural grace throughout. Mrs. Holt will, however, do well to repress the somewhat painful straining of her voice in the quite superfluous effort to make herself heard all over the theatre. Miss Ida Herbert’s conception and representation of the part of the street arab, Gipsy Tom, was one of the greatest artistic successes of the evening. Mr. Frank Cates’ success in the impersonation of Richard Redcliffe, Annie’s unscrupulous husband, was sufficiently evident from the execration which the audience bestowed upon him whenever he appeared. Mrs. Walter Hill, an old favourite, made the most of the humour in her character of Biddy Maloney, and the cockney swagger of Lizzie Jenkinson (Miss Mabel Tracey) and her husband, Professor “Chawley” Johnson (Mr. A. G. Poulton) aided much in the entertainment of the audience. Mr. Walter Howe acted well as John Biddlecombe. the true-hearted rustic, and tiny Miss Ward won golden opinions for her precocity as Little Paul, son of the heroine. The numerous incidental characters were creditably filled by members of the company. The audience were in thorough sympathy with the actors throughout the evening, and calls before the curtain were frequent. “Alone in London” will be repeated          to-night, and to-morrow evening the performance will be under the patronage and in the presence of his Excellency the Governor.



The Stage (9 March, 1888 - p.14)


     On Monday evening, March 5, a revival of the drama, Alone in London, by Robert Buchanan and Harriett Jay, took place at this theatre, now under the management of Mr. Morris Abrahams. The play is so well known that any sketch of the plot seems to be quite unnecessary, and we will therefore devote the limited space at command to a description of the present production. Mr.Isaac Cohen, a past master in work of the kind, has undertaken the laborious details of stage arrangement of the drama with the most signal success. A praiseworthy attention to the minutiæ of stage management is perceptible throughout the whole course of the play, and the rapidity and “cleanness” with which the various mechanical changes are effected are worthy of the very highest commendation. We would particularly mention the second scene in the first act, where, from an interior of a low lodging-house in Drury-lane, a transformation is made with the greatest smoothness and despatch to the brilliantly-lighted Westminster-bridge and Houses of Parliament. Mr. J. A. Howell as Benevolent Jenkinson, and in the many aliases of that wily and unscrupulous scoundrel, gave indication of a careful study of the part, while Mr. A. C. Lilly made fair capital out of the heartless villanies of Richard Redcliffe. Spriggins, in the hands of Mr. Charles Reeves, was a rather colourless “swell,” and Mr. George Yates as the bland and benevolent Mr. Burnaby did not achieve any considerable success. Mr. James Stevenson imparted a good deal of humour to the humble professional Charlie Johnson, and with Miss Maud Stafford secured much applause for the travelling show and its marvellous resources in snakes and kindred attractions. Miss Ethel Arden gave a prettily pathetic rendering of the interesting flower girl, Nan; and the poor little waif, Tom Chickweed, was capitally sustained by Miss Emilie Hatton, who threw a world of sweetness into her simple songs. The Mrs. Malony of Miss Harriet Clifton was a racy and thoroughly artistic impersonation of a virtuous matron of Cord, loud in denunciation and strongly convincing, perhaps more from overwhelming eloquence than from logical exactness, yet convincing still. Miss Elliston had not much to do as Adele Clifton, but acquitted herself in every available way with distinction. Walter Burnaby was suitably “gullish” in the hands of Mr. Webb Darleigh. Mr. Felix Pitt made a capital John Biddlecombe, and Messrs. Sparkes, Sidney, Heller, and Benson were efficient as the Lame Duck, the Ballad Singer, Robert, and the Inspector. Messrs. J. Clark, Harding and Godfrey were also in the cast, and Miss Moody made an agreeable Susan, the servant.



Lloyd’s Weekly London Newspaper (11 March, 1888 - p.5)


     Mr. Morris Abrahams, who has catered so liberally and so successfully for the East-end, has now undertaken the management of this large house on the southern side of the Thames. He opened on Monday night with the Olympic drama, Alone in London, written by Mr. Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay. Though anything but a brilliant specimen of theatrical workmanship it appeals strongly to the feeling of an audience; and several of those present were roused to the point of indulging in exclamations respecting the conduct of the characters. While the villains were received with general hissing, suffering virtue called forth sympathetic approbation. Miss Arden, as Annie Meadows; Miss Kate Varley, as Tom Chickweed; and Mr. Felix Pitt, as John Biddlecombe, carried off the chief honours in the acting. Mr. Cohen’s skilful stage management was made apparent in several of the elaborate “sets,” and the piece held the attention of the audience to the close. The new manager has turned the space formerly occupied by the circus into comfortable shilling stalls; and with the gallery at fourpence, and pit sixpence, a bold bid is made for public favour. Frequent changes are promised, the 19th inst. being fixed for the appearance of Miss Fannie Leslie in Racing.



Reynolds’s Newspaper (11 March, 1888)


     Although the theatre in the Westminster-bridge-road, known equally well as Ashley’s and Sanger’s, has been only a few days in the hands of Mr. Morris Abrahams and of his energetic aide-de-camp, Mr. Isaac Cohen, the aspect of the house on Monday evening, when it opened under the management of the former gentleman, showed how much can be done in a short time with enterprise and liberality. The auditorium has been cleaned, garnished, re-upholstered, florally decorated, and festally lighted. The orchestra, which, all praise to the management, consisted of the burnt-out musicians from the Grand, performed between the acts some bright and sparkling music; and the play, Mr. Robert Buchanan’s and Harriet Jay’s “Alone in London,” has never been better represented, or to a more appreciative audience, the scenes representing Westminster-bridge, the old sluice-house and flood-gates on the Thames being splendid specimens of realistic stage scenery, and calling forth admiring plaudits from the beholders. Of the acting also it is a pleasant task to speak in terms of high praise. Mr. A. C. Lilly, without overacting, gave a powerful and uncompromising rendering of the part of the adventurer, Richard Redcliffe; Miss Ethel Arden made of Nan, the flower-girl, a pathetic and telling role; John Biddlecombe, the honest miller—a part created by Mr. Leonard Boyne—found an equally good exponent in Mr. Felix Pitt—higher praise could not be given; Mrs. Molony, in the hands of Miss Harriett Clifton, was made a sketch of Hibernian humour that took the fancy of the house immensely; the part of Liz Jenkinson was well rendered by Miss Maude Stafford; and that of her father, the Benevolent Jenkinson, made as amusing a thief, philosopher, and dubious friend of as one could wish to see, by Mr. J. A. Howell; and Tom Chickweed—a part originally played by, and probably written for herself by, Miss Harriett Jay—elicited sympathy, not to say tears, from the audience, so vividly was it pictured by Miss Emily Hatton. Other parts were played by Messrs. Charles Reeves, Mr. George Yates, and Mr. Webb  Darleigh, Mesdames Kate Varley and little Ada Oakley, all working well and loyally for the success which Mr. Abrahams’ opening night obtained. If the enterprising manager goes on as he has begun, the money he has, so to speak, flung out of window will not be long in coming back by the doors, bringing a good many of its coined brethren with it.



The Era (27 April, 1889)

On Monday, April 22d, the Drama,
by Robert Buchanan and Harriet Jay, entitled

John Biddlecomb    ...    ...    Mr LEONARD BOYNE
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr EDMUND GURNEY
Mr Spriggins             ...     ...     Mr JOHN TRESAHAR
Mr Burnaby             ...    ...    Mr GILBERT FARQUHAR
Walter Burnaby       ...    ...    Mr ARTHUR MARCEL
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr FAWCETT LOMAX
Charlie Johnson      ...    ...    Mr FRANK M. WOOD
Tom Chickweed      ...     ...     Miss JULIA WARDEN
Jack Woods           ...    ...    Mr SIDNEY BURT
The Lame Duck      ...    ...    Mr HOSKINS
Robert                     ...     ...     Mr C. WARREN
Annie Meadows and Nan ...    Miss FLORENCE WEST
Little Paul                ...    ...    Miss EVELYN FLEXMORE
Ruth Clifden             ...     ...     Miss ADAH BARTON
Liz Jenkinson          ...    ...    Miss KATIE JAMES
Mrs Malony             ...     ...     Miss HARRIET CLIFTON
Susan                      ...    ...    Miss GLENVILLE
Harcourt                 ...    ...    Mr R. PEEL
Jim                          ...    ...    Mr WYBROW
Isaacs                     ...    ...    Mr BENSON
David                      ...    ...    Mr COOPER

     In our notice of the original production of Alone in London at the Olympic Theatre, on Nov. 2d, 1885, we remarked that the pruning knife, if judiciously used, would transform the drama into a very fair specimen of plays of its class, and one very likely to attract and amuse those playgoers who are not too critically inclined. The success of Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay’s piece in the provinces has proved that our expectations were well founded; and its favorable reception at the Grand Theatre, Islington, this week has shown that, though Alone in London hardly bore successfully the ordeal of West-end criticism, it nevertheless contains all the elements of provincial and suburban popularity. It must be admitted that probability is not one of its many virtues; but the interest is well sustained throughout, and there is plenty of sympathy and pathos of the kind beloved by the masses. The drama has been well received at the Grand Theatre this week, where it has had the advantage of being extremely well acted. In the original production, as will be remembered, Miss Amy Roselle was the Annie Meadows and Mr Herbert Standing the Richard Redcliffe. Though these artists are absent from the present cast, Mr Wilmot has been able to secure the services of several well-known West-end actors and actresses, and to engage one or two of the original representatives of the play. Mr Leonard Boyne repeats his admirable impersonation of John Biddlecomb, and develops the hearty generosity and genial humour of the miller with excellent effect. Mr Gilberrt Farquhar has considerably improved since he first sustained the character of Mr Burnaby, and his representation of the elderly and guileless banker is even more finished and accurate than on that occasion. Mr John Tresahar resumed his original part of Spriggins, and gave a light and humorous character sketch which was really funny and perfectly free from the exaggeration with which the type is often treated. Mr Edmund Gurney played Richard Redcliffe on Monday with well sustained ease, acute characterisation, and artistic firmness. His reading of the rôle was admirable throughout, and was highly commendable for its true balance and incisive finish. Mr Arthur Marcel has many personal advantages for the representation of a personage like Walter Burnaby, and played the part in a gentlemanlike and unaffected manner. Mr Fawcett Lomax made Jenkinson a very funny individual indeed, and elicited hearty laughter by his droll and amusing treatment of the character. Mr Frank M. Wood hit off cleverly the peculiarities of Charlie Johnson, and with him must be bracketed for warm praise Miss Katie James, whose assumption of the cheery vulgarity of Liz Jenkinson was all the more clever as every playgoer knows how daintily refined Miss James can be upon occasion. Her dance in short skirts was neat, but being a little “out of the piece,” was not received as well as it might have been as a separate variety item. Mr Frank Wood’s song, “The Lime-kiln Club,” came in very well, however, in the  Drury-lane lodging-house scene. Miss Florence West gave an excellent impersonation of the afflicted Annie Meadows. Miss West’s refinement of style and delicacy of touch were extremely valuable to her, and her earnestness and intelligence were both distinctly displayed. The affection of the mother for her child, her clinging love for her worthless husband, and her fiery indignation at his dastardly desertion and slander in the second act were all depicted with the histrionic skill of which Miss West is so liberally possessed. Miss Julia Warden assumed with much cleverness and fervour the characteristics of Tom Chickweed; and brought out distinctly the faithful and affectionate qualities of the  “waif.” Miss Adah Barton made a prepossessing and agreeable representative of Ruth Clifden; and Miss Harriet Clifton delivered the many good lines given to Mrs Malony with the ease and effect of a practised artist. The smaller parts were all in efficient hands; and the performance, all-round, was very thorough and complete. The scenery, an important item of any production of Alone in London, was as elaborate and effective as was necessary; the mechanical changes being greatly admired. Mr Wilmot seems determined to make the style of entertainment on the stage of his theatre worthy of the beauty and brilliancy of the auditorium, the effect of which, now that the tints have toned down a little, is even more enjoyable to the eye than at the opening of the house.



The Scotsman (24 October, 1889 - p. 4)


     Melodrama, highly coloured, and of the good old-fashioned type, runs at the Theatre Royal this week. “Alone in London,” by Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay, has been before the public for a long time, and in its earlier days was regarded, as in some quarters it is still, as a very effective play of its class, but marred by a too sombre and exaggerated picture of human life. The light and shade are not well balanced, and in depicting the seamy side of life, even in the great Metropolis, realism is sacrificed to effect. It is a piece in which the “gods” revel, and as it has not been seen in the Theatre Royal for nearly half a dozen years, the occupants of that part of the house turned out in great force last night, and enjoyed themselves to their hearts’ content. All the cheaper parts of the building were densely crowded, and although the audience in the gallery were at times rather noisy, they entered thoroughly into the spirit of the play, and cheered virtue and hooted vice with all the vigour they could put forth. The plot, running on somewhat hackneyed lines, deals with an innocent girl lured from her country home by the traditional stage villain, and cast off in London to make her living as a flower-seller. But even there she is pursued by her brutal husband, who seeks to use her and her child to further his nefarious schemes as a swell-mobsman, and she is only saved from a cruel death by the timeous intervention of a former lover from the country. Although the situations are unreal, they are sufficiently exciting and thrilling to suit the taste of those who like this sort of thing, and by the introduction of clever stage mechanism some of the scenes are made very effective. Mr J. F. Elliston’s company gave a very good representation of the play. Miss Lily C. Bandmann acted very sympathetically and with a considerable deal of force and feeling as the sorely-tried wife. The part of her brutal husband, Richard Redcliffe, was sufficiently emphasised on the villainous side by Mr Charles Howitt; and his partners in crime had capable representatives in Mr Burrowes Nugent and Mr T. H. Solly. Mr Wm. Maclaren was manly and sincere in his personation of the kind-hearted country miller, John Biddlecomb; and the poor waif, Tom Chickwood, and the little boy Paul, were very pleasingly rendered by Miss Ethel Ward and Miss Phyllis Graham respectively. The little humour in the piece was supplied by Mr Lonnen Meadows and Miss Ada Tilley, although the fun was rather strained. Other parts satisfactorily filled were those of Mr J. W. Wilkinson, a philanthropic banker; Miss Lilyan Lait, an heiress; and Miss Maggie Cardiff, an Irish orange-seller. An excellent programme of music was rendered during the evening by the orchestra, under Mr B. Bucalossi.



The Northern Echo (29 January, 1890 - p.3)

     DARLINGTON THEATRE ROYAL.—“Alone in London,” here this week, is the fine drama—authors, Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay—which “opened” the beautiful new building after the disastrous fire. The play was then entrusted to a company touring under the ægis of Messrs Miller & Elliston, the well-known dramatic caterers, and both play and company were highly spoken of by all classes of the local community. The drama is now again produced under the auspices of Messrs Miller & Elliston, and it would be a singularly perfect stage piece which did not admit of improvement as time went on. Good as “Alone in London” was upon its first production in Darlington, it is very much better now, both as regards the staging and the acting. The really clever mechanical changes never worked so smoothly, and the cast is quite on a par with that with which the company has been heretofore identified. Several old favourites are still included. There is Percy Bell as Jenkinson, and there is Miss Bessie Foote—one of the good old school—as Mrs Maloney. Mr W. P. Dempsey is the “lion comique,” Charlie Johnson, with Miss Madge Douglas as his music hall partner, Liz. Miss Carlotta de Yonson, a nom de theatre which is not calculated to add to her reputation, is judiciously passionate and pathetic by turns; Mr Charles Harley is the personification of a swell mobsman; and Mr Frank Vincent is a manly John Biddlecombe, the large-hearted yeoman.



The Era (16 May, 1891)

On Monday, May 11th, the Drama,
in a Prologue and Four Acts,
by Robert Buchanan and Harriet Jay, entitled


John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr C. J. HAGUE
Annie Meadows      ...    ...    Miss ANNIE CONWAY
Jack Wood              ...     ...     Mr ARTHUR HALL
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr ERNEST LEICESTER
Spriggins                  ...     ...     Mr FRED. CONQUEST
Gipsy Tom              ...    ...    Miss CISSY FARRELL
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr C. CRUIKSHANKS


Mr Burnaby             ...     ...     Mr H. BELDING
Walter Burnaby       ...    ...    Mr EDWARD LENNOX
Ruth Clifton             ...    ...    Miss AMY FARRELL
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr ERNEST LEICESTER
Spriggins                  ...     ...     Mr FRED. CONQUEST
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr C. CRUIKSHANKS
Liz Jenkinson            ...     ...     Miss L. DYSON
John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr C. J. HAGUE
Charlie Johnson        ...     ...     Mr GEO. CONQUEST, jun.
Nan                        ...    ...    Miss ANNIE CONWAY
Little Paul                ...    ...    Miss DIMES
Tom Chickweed      ...    ...    Miss CISSY FARRELL
Mrs Maloney          ...    ...    Miss C. DILLON
Robert                     ...     ...     Mr DONNE
Inspector of Police  ...    ...    Mr STEVENS
David                      ...    ...    Mr REUBEN LESLIE
Susan                      ...    ...    Miss THOMAS

     Even in a condition which, we understand, is incomplete, the glories of the new entrance to the stalls and boxes at the Surrey Theatre are positively dazzling, and when once the pang of drawing the cheque for the expenses is past, Mr Conquest may cheerfully congratulate himself upon having made a decided improvement in the appearance and convenience of his house. On each side, as the visitor mounts the new staircase, he sees himself reflected in gorgeous mirrors, at the foot of each of which appears to be growing a small flower-bed of ivy-leaved geraniums. The way to the box level is shortened by many yards, and, altogether, the approach is much ameliorated. All these luxuries, however, avail nothing to a Surrey audience unless the entertainment inside be to their taste, and Mr Conquest has played a safe card for this and Whitsun week by the announcement of Alone in London. Despite the small mercy which it received from the critics on its first performance at the old Olympic Theatre, Mr Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay’s piece seems to have great “staying” qualities in the provinces and elsewhere. The situations, if not novel, are very effective; and if some of the characters are old friends, that does not prevent their peculiarities from being amusing, and their eccentricities interesting, to a popular audience. The company at the Surrey at present is working together very nicely indeed, the “old stagers” being as staunch as ever, and the comparatively young ones developing and culminating admirably. Miss Amy Farrell, a bright and intelligent young lady, plays sympathetically as Ruth Clifton; and that useful actress Miss Cissy Farrell enacts Tom Chickweed very brightly and smartly. Then there is Mr George Conquest, jun., who is as solidly droll as ever as Charlie Johnson, and Mr C. Cruikshanks’ face and figure lend themselves happily to his make-up as Jenkinson, his demure comedy in the part being very amusing. Patience, industry, and talent have made Miss Annie Conway quite equal to the sustention of the arduous rôle of Nan, and she plays it throughout in artistic and thoroughly excellent style, and Miss L. Dyson is a lively representative of Liz Jenkinson. Strong earnest acting is required in the rôle of John Biddlecombe, and that Mr C. J. Hague supplies with his usual histrionic force, and Mr Ernest Leicester contributes a well-considered and effective performance of the part of Richard Redcliffe, satisfactory renderings being given of the characters of the Burnabys by Mr H. Belding and Mr Edward Lennox, and Mr Fred. Conquest showing marked promise as Spriggins. The scenery is excellent, the quick change behind tableaux curtains in the second act being done very smartly.



The Stage (16 July, 1891 - p.5)

     BOLTON—ROYAL (Managing Director, Mr. J. F. Elliston).—The management have this week placed upon the boards Robert Buchanan’s Alone in London. Mr. Lonnen Meadows sustains the part of old Jenks with his usual versatile ability. Mr. James E. Thompson’s Redcliffe, the adventurer, and Mr. Lionel Dainer’s John Biddlecombe are both able performances. Miss Alice Dorie sustains the principal part as the heroine, her acting being most enjoyable and thoroughly natural and unforced. Miss Minnie Howard as Ruth Clifton makes a charming exponent of the part assigned to her.  Miss Lalor Shiel’s Tom Chickweed, the waif, is most natural throughout. The scenery and mechanical effects are good, and, judging from the large houses, the revival of the old stock companies seems to gain in public favour.



The Times (22 December, 1891 - p. 4)


     Alone in London, a melodrama by Mr. Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay, was revived last evening at the Princess’s Theatre. It is produced at an opportune moment, for it is just one of those strongly-flavoured dramatic compositions which appeal to the palate of the Christmas playgoer. The law of poetical justice is paramount in Alone in London. Those who depart from the paths of honesty meet with the reward they richly merit; while rectitude in rags is eventually triumphant in spite of all the machinations of designing villany. The element of contrast is unsparingly utilized, and the scene changes repeatedly in accordance with the time-honoured traditions of the melodrama. From the breezy Suffolk countryside the spectator is hurried to the interior of a low lodging-house in Drury-lane, and thence to Westminster-bridge and the Houses of Parliament by night. The garden of an exhibition at South Kensington and the Thames by moonlight are pressed into the service of the plot, and the characters with marvellous ubiquity transfer themselves and the action of the play from one locality to another with enviable ease. None the less, Alone in London is a good specimen of the class of piece to which it belongs, and should succeed in drawing large audiences at the present season. The cast is a good one, and includes Mr. Henry Neville, Mr. W. L. Abingdon, Miss Ella Terriss, Miss Maud Elmore, Mr. Fuller Mellish, and Mr. Wilfrid E. Shine.



The Morning Post (22 December, 1891 - p. 3)


     Last night the drama entitled “Alone in London,” by Mr. Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay, was received with a success that promises to make it one of the most successful plays of the holiday season. The theatre was crowded, and the hearty applause bestowed had the ring of genuine appreciation. It is only just to the performers to declare that the drama was better played as a whole than when originally produced, and great pains had evidently been taken by the management to place the play upon the stage in an effective and picturesque manner. Some of the scenes evoked hearty applause as they came and vanished like dissolving views. But a feature of greater importance was the excellent acting, which was entirely to the satisfaction of the audience. The drama has some effective situations, one in particular being greeted with almost unbounded applause. This was when the young wife, cast adrift by the reckless adventurer, finds a home and friends in the very house where her scoundrel of a husband is seeking to make a new matrimonial alliance. Here Miss Maud Elmore was excellent. Her acting rose to the situation, and was rewarded with applause of the most enthusiastic kind. Mr. Henry Neville was seen to advantage, and as the villain of the drama Mr. Abingdon played his  best. In more than one of his scenes he recalled Mr. Willard in the days when he used to appear in characters of this  kind. Miss Ella Terriss was charming in the character of a street arab, and Mr. Wilfred E. Shine was remarkably clever as Jenkinson. Mr. Fuller Mellish, as a scoundrel of another type, played well, and all the performers were efficient. It is certain that “Alone in London” will prove very attractive during the holidays.



The Globe (22 December, 1891 - p.3)


     “Alone in London,” a drama by Mr. Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay, first produced half a dozen years ago at the Olympic, met with an encouraging amount of success. It has now, accordingly, with a complete change of cast, been included in the series of revivals of melodrama in progress at the Princess’s. Few pieces have been built upon more familiar lines. It presents in abundance those scenes of so-called realism which are more fanciful than any fiction, and introduces us to carousals in Drury-lane lodging houses, and somewhat promiscuous distribution of charity in Westminster. It has scenery which revolves and revolves until the head of the spectator grows dizzy, and it ends with a sensational incident, the attempt to drown the heroine in a sluice by opening the flood-gates, which Boucicault and Falconer might have envied. As virtue and innocence, though sorely pressed, triumph in the end, as all the sympathy is with the good characters and the evil have no element of redeeming humanity, and get in the end their deserts, everything is piece and performance appeals to a holiday audience. The evolution of the story is watched accordingly with profound interest, and the revival is a success. Fortunate indeed is the management that possesses an actor such as Mr. Henry Neville, to play the stalwart miller, who is practically the hero. A miller is said to have a golden thumb, but Mr. Neville is all gold. When he fronts with a light whip a mob of ruffians armed with sticks and other weapons, we are not surprised to see them shrink and abandon their prey. He is throughout, indeed, the type of chivalry, loyalty, and daring. Mr. Leonard Boyne was the first representative of the part. Mr. W. L. Abingdon, succeeding Mr. Standing as an unredeemed scoundrel, wholly unworthy of the affection prettily but superfluously lavished upon him by Miss Maud Elmore, who succeeds Miss Amy Roselle as the heroine. Miss Ella Terriss replaces Miss Jay, if we remember rightly, as the London waif, who proves a valiant protector of the heroine. Mrs. Clifton, as Biddy Malony, shows herself the possessor of a wonderful voice, and Mr. Wilfrid E. Shine, Mr. Fuller Mellish, Miss Warden, Miss Beatrice Selwyn, and other actors took part in an entertainment that is wholly suited to the Christmas playgoer, and goes amid loudest demonstrations of approval.



The Scotsman (22 December, 1891 - p. 5)

LONDON, Monday Night.
     The management of the Princess Theatre has chosen for its winter evening attraction the four-act play by Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay, which was produced originally at the Olympic Theatre a little more than six years ago. The role of the heroine was then played by Miss Amy Roselle, that of the hero by Mr Leonard Boyne, that of the villain by Mr Herbert Standing, and that of Tom Chickweed, a boy figuring prominently in the story, by Miss Jay herself. Latterly Miss Jay resigned the part of Tom to Miss Louisa Gourlay, assuming instead that of the heroine, Annie Meadows. “Alone in London,” was sufficiently successful at the Olympic to warrant its being taken on tour. Since then it has not been seen in London until now. It is not at all a bad piece of its kind. Mr Buchanan seems to have revised it somewhat, and as it stands “Alone in London” if old-fashioned in motive, characterisation, and incidents, is not without a certain stage effectiveness for which holiday audiences are always ready to be grateful. On the present occasion the four characters above named are undertaken by Miss Maud Elmore, Mr Henry Neville, Mr W. L. Abingdon and Miss Ella Terriss—the last-named bright little actress appearing for the first time in a boy’s part. Miss Elmore is new to the West End, and proves an efficient if rather stagey artist of the “èmotional” sort. The others play excellently in their well-known style. The “humorous” passages are well looked after by Mr W. E. Shine, Mr Henry Bedford, Mrs Clifton, and sprightly Miss Julia Warden; other parts are well filled by Mr Fuller Mellish and Miss B. Selwyn, and on the whole the vigorous if conventional melodrama is better done and better received now than it was six years ago. It will no doubt attract largely during the festival season.



The Stage (24 December, 1891 - p.10)


     Alone in London, originally produced at the old Olympic on November 2, 1885, and since given occasionally at outlying houses in town and frequently at provincial theatres, was revived at the Princess’s on Monday, December 21. The popular policy that Mr. S. Herberte-Basing is vigorously pursuing in the restoration of the Princess’s to its old favoured place with the playgoing million ought to gain substantially from this revival. Robert Buchanan and Harriett Jay’s melodrama is the right piece for hearty holiday audiences, by whom emphatic sentimentality and moving incident, quickly alternating as a somewhat sensational scenario unfolds itself, are always keenly relished. The melodrama suffers nothing, but on the contrary benefits largely by the present performance by a company with Mr. Henry Neville at the head, decidedly well supported by his fellow-members. The part of the cheery, true-hearted miller falls, of course, to Mr. Neville, whose John Biddlecombe has all the buoyant force of playing, with that invincible touch of camaraderie, which lies within the art of this accomplished player, as perhaps it lies nowhere else. For two acts out of the four and the prologue nothing is seen of the John Biddlecombe of Mr. Neville: there could not be a greater loss to the acting of the piece. For the very wicked trio—Jenkinson, bland and philosophic in his roguery; Spriggins, spruce in his, and Richard Redcliffe, with the “polish” of melodrama’s out-and-out villainy thick upon him—excellent exposition comes from Mr. Wilfred E. Shine, Mr. Fuller Mellish, and Mr. W. L. Abingdon respectively, who all play with admirable artistic restraint and full effect. Mr. Charles Steuart depicts the benevolent traits of old Mr. Burnaby skilfully, and Mr. T. Kingston is satisfactory in the small part of Burnaby, jun., while Messrs. T. Verner (Jack Woods), Louis Warner (Robert), and Percy Ames (David) are suitably cast in episodical characters. Mr. Henry Bedford has only poor material for humour as Charlie Johnson, but such as it is, he makes the most of it. Miss Maud Elmore as the distressed heroine shows on the Princess’s stage, no less successfully, abilities which have often been put to the test at the Pavilion, whose audiences in parts of this sort have no mean critical judgment. Miss Elmore plays the exacting rôle with the charm of natural gift and the facility of experience. Miss Julia Warden is appropriately full of exuberant spirits in the part of Liz Jenkinson; and Mrs. Clifton, with a rich voice and an equally rich humour, gives a felicitous bit of acting as the old orange-woman, Mrs. Malony. Miss Ella Terriss appears in a part new to her, that of a boy, in which she does much better than could be expected. She fails, naturally enough, altogether to sink her femininity, especially in voice; but there is some truth in her playing and a good deal of clever work. The melodrama is liberally put on with a mise-en-scène that, taken from first to last, is quite kaleidoscopic in its variety. The whole stage presentation of Alone in London—which is under the direction of Mr. Isaac Cohen—is decidedly good, and the gentleman named and all concerned have every title to congratulation.



The Era (26 December, 1891)

Revival, on Monday Evening, Dec. 21st,
of the Drama, in a Prologue and Four Acts,
by Mr Robert Buchanan and Miss Harriett Jay, entitled


John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr HENRY NEVILLE
Annie Meadows      ...    ...    Miss MAUD ELMORE
Jack Woods             ...     ...     Mr THOMAS VERNER
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr W. L. ABINGDON
Gipsy Tom              ...    ...    Miss ELLA TERRISS
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr WILFRED E. SHINE
Spriggins                  ...     ...     Mr FULLER MELLISH


John Biddlecombe   ...    ...    Mr HENRY NEVILLE
Mr Burnaby             ...     ...     Mr CHARLES STEUART
Walter Burnaby       ...    ...    Mr T. KINGSTON
Ruth Clifton             ...    ...    Miss BEATRICE SELWYN
Richard Redcliffe      ...     ...     Mr W. L. ABINGDON
Spriggins                  ...     ...     Mr FULLER MELLISH
Jenkinson                ...    ...    Mr WILFRED E. SHINE
Liz Jenkinson            ...     ...     Miss JULIA WARDEN
Charlie Johnson        ...     ...     Mr HENRY BEDFORD
Nan                          ...     ...     Miss MAUD ELMORE
Little Paul                ...    ...    Little MAY BLACKBURN
Tom Chickweed      ...    ...    Miss ELLA TERRISS
Mrs Malony             ...     ...     Mrs CLIFTON
Robert                     ...     ...     Mr LOUIS WARNER
Inspector of Police  ...    ...    Mr G. AUBREY
David                      ...    ...    Mr PERCY AMES
Susan                      ...    ...    Miss E. ROYDALL

     In accordance with the managerial policy which he has laid down for himself, Mr Sidney Herberte-Basing has followed up his previous revivals with the reintroduction to a London audience of the drama above named. Whether or not the enterprising manager of the erstwhile popular theatre could have made a choice which would have augured better for the financial success of his enterprise is no matter at the moment; suffice it that the play, which is to be the evening attraction at the Princess’s during the forthcoming holiday time, has been staged with commendable care and completeness and with such an admirable desire to give it a picturesque and taking setting as to elicit expressions of well- deserved admiration. Certainly all possible care has been bestowed upon this revival of Alone in London, and it may assuredly be ranked as one of the most perfect all-round representations that could by any possibility be provided for the drama. Mr Isaac Cohen’s stage-management has been of the greatest service. The amount of detail and of illustrative incident introduced into the general action of the play save it from the commonplace, and raise it into the realms of true realism, as far as realism is permissible amid surroundings so bizarre and exaggerated. In melodrama, however, it is not absolutely necessary to be natural. So long as the male spectator can have all his chivalry aroused at the heroism of the virtuous lover and all his moral senses arrayed against the machinations of the villains of the plot, and so long as the female spectator can indulge in the same emotions, with the actual addition of “a good cry,” no more is asked; naturalism is neglected, and strict attention to probabilities are thrown to the winds. After all, it is good for the concoctors of melodrama that this is the case; otherwise, their task would be even more difficult than it is. The excellence of the mounting of Alone in London is exceeded by the fine cast engaged in its representation. A glance through the names printed at the head of this record will prove that Mr Basing has collected around him a first-class company, and it is almost a pity that the eminent talents of some of the members are wasted upon the unworthy material. Mr Henry Neville, for example, is entirely unfitted when supplied with a rôle like John Biddlecombe; yet, this perfect actor of lover’s parts gives this worthless sketch a distinction such as scarcely any other actor could supply. Mr W. L. Abingdon’s impersonation of Richard Radcliffe is one of the most consistently brutal and artistically contrasted characters which this able actor has yet given to the stage. He was so perfectly hateful throughout as to have lifted the character altogether out of the groove of ordinary villains. Miss Maud Elmore as the persecuted heroine could not possibly have been improved upon. This clever actress was the object of particular sympathy, and her work obtained special recognition. Miss Ella Terriss was excellent as the beggar-boy Tom Chickweed. This performance was not merely that of a young lady masquerading in a female disguise; it was a piece of genuinely pathetic acting. Miss Julia Warden as Liz was particularly good. This admirable actress so heartily entered into the spirit of the part, and she threw into it such a wealth of womanly feeling, as to make a rôle of secondary importance stand forth as a leading part. The same remarks may be applied to Mr Henry Bedford’s impersonation of Charlie Johnson, as it proved to be an admirable companion picture to that of Liz. Mr Wilfred E. Shine was excellent as Jenkinson, and Mr Fuller Mellish was good as Spriggins. Miss Beatrice Selwyn, whose professional début in After Dark was regarded as most promising, had no opportunity of distinguishing herself as Ruth Clifton, but she may be congratulated upon having done the very utmost with the materials supplied to her, and of having added to her reputation thereby. Mrs Clifton was so very excellent as Mrs Malony that praise may seem to be almost superfluous, yet it must needs be recorded that no more lifelike, powerful, or telling performance of the part could possibly have been given. The characters of minor interest were all carefully acted, and the revival was received with every indication of a renewed lease of popularity.


The Colonies and India (26 December, 1891 - p. 15)

     “Alone in London,” written, it will be remembered, by Mr. Buchanan and Miss Harriet Jay, was revived last Monday at the Princess’, and seems likely to be eminently popular during the holidays. Not only has it been well put upon the stage, but an excellent cast has been provided. Mr. Henry Neville is of course a host in himself, and, appearing in one of his usual parts, was warmly greeted. Mr. Abingdon was (of course) the villain, assisted by Mr. Fuller Mellish as second in command, and displayed much ability in the character; Miss Maud Elmore was the heroine, and roused the audience to enthusiasm in one well-contrived scene. Mr. Wilfrid Shine supported the lighter element in the drama with the help of Miss Ella Terriss, who was excellent in the part of the Street Arab originally played by Miss Harriet Jay.



The Star (Christchurch, New Zealand) (10 October, 1893 - p.1)



     There was a full house at the Theatre Royal last evening, when Mr Bland Holt treated theatre-goers to the fourth and final change of the present season. The piece chosen was the popular drama Alone in London, from the joint pens of Robert Buchanan and Harriet Jay. The drama belongs to an older school than the other pieces put on during the Company’s present season, and differs materially from them in most respects. The piece opens with a prologue in which the villain, Richard Redcliffe (Mr W. E. Baker), wins the heart of a country maiden from a bluff and awkward miller (Mr Walter Howe) in spite of a warning from Gipsy Tom (Miss Harrie Ireland), a waif from London, who has, on a previous occasion been crippled by Redcliffe’s cruelty. The first act opens some six years later in a low lodging-house in London, to which Mr and Mrs Redcliffe and their child have drifted. The man having fallen to the level of a common thief and swindler, has allied himself with Jenkinson, a cunning rogue known as “Benevolent Jenkinson” (Mr Bland Holt) who have for their accomplice a swell mobsman named Spriggins (Mr R. E. Watson). The wife, who is now known as “Nan the Flower Girl,” and her child are rescued from their miserable life by a benevolent old gentleman named Burnaby (Mr E. C. Corlesse), who is a partner in a banking firm near London. The husband, who has been in gaol for some time, on being released, and imagining his wife dead, turns up at the Burnaby’s residence, at Hendon, as a suitor for the hand of Burnaby’s niece, Ruth Cliffton (Miss F. Dillon), and is confronted by his wife, who holds a responsible position in the household; and though he denies that he is her husband, his identity is proved by his child recognising him. The next seen of the unhappy couple is in a dingy-looking riverside apartment on the Thames. Redcliffe having succeeded in leading Mr Burnaby’s only son into difficulties, has persuaded him to forge his father’s name to a bill, and thus has him in his power. He, with his accomplices, decides to rob Burnaby’s bank, and arranges to fasten the guilt on to young Burnaby. His wife, overhearing the plot, begs him not to commit the crime, and being unsuccessful in her entreaties, manages to secure the forged bill, which the villains intended to use as evidence against the banker’s son. The villains take the child from the mother in order to assist them in their plans, and she is taken in a fainting condition to some old flood-gates and tied in such a way that when the gates are opened she will be drowned. However, at this supreme moment the hero turns up in the shape of the miller whom she had rejected in order to marry Redcliffe, and he rescues her from death, and on the gang entering the bank at night in fulfilment of their plan, they find themselves trapped and confronted with those whom they have so long duped. Redcliffe is in the act of shooting at his wife, when he is stabbed from behind by Gipsy Tom, who has all along been a true friend to the injured wife, and the curtain falls.
     The drama is full of sensation, and is plentifully interspersed with striking situations. On the whole the characters were well sustained, though some of the minor parts showed a want of rehearsal inseparable from a first production. Mrs Bland Holt made a blithe keeper’s daughter in the prologue, and certainly scored a success in her emotional scenes, though at times perhaps hardly rising to the height the part deserves. Miss Harrie Ireland had a trying part to fill, and her impersonation of the poor ragged boy was a meritorious one. Her devotion to Nan was well depicted, and her acting throughout was quiet and unobtrusive. Miss F. Dillon was a charming Ruth Cliffton, and though the part was a small one she made the most of it. Miss Edith Blande seemed quite at home in the part of the slatternly lodging-house “slavey,” and afterwards as the “merry Scotch girl” at the London music hall caused much amusement. Miss Annie Taylor showed that she is quite at home in an Irish character, her Biddy Maloney, the faithful old apple woman, who stands by the heroine through all her troubles, being a good piece of acting. Little Ethel deserves a word of encouragement for the natural manner in  which she played the part of the child, and her lines were distinctly and intelligently given. Mr Walter Howe, as the bluff and awkward Suffolk miller, had a rôle entirely different from any previously filled by him here, and succeeded thoroughly in catching the Suffolk dialect, while his action was unrestrained. Mr W. E. Baker, as the cool and calculating villain, succeeded in so thoroughly arousing the indignation of the audience that his appearance was always the signal for groans. Mr R. E. Watson was sufficiently affected in the part of the swell; Mr E. C. Corlesse made a benevolent-looking old gentleman; while Mr R. Inman sustained the part of his son with credit. Mr Bland Holt as the philosopher and thief, Benevolent Jenkinson, made a decided hit, and his impersonation of the many-sided character was the cause of much amusement. Mr C. Brown was exceedingly funny as Professor Johnson, a humble professional; his scenes with Miss Blande causing hearty laughter. The other characters were filled by Messrs T. Bruce, Hyland, Kemp, Halkett, Pringle, Counter, Wilson and England, with a host of supers.
     The principals had to respond to enthusiastic calls between the acts, and the audience were uproarious in their applause at some of the situations. The scenery and stage effects were quite equal to those of the preceding pieces. The representation of Westminster bridge, with the Thames shining in the moonlight and the Houses of Parliament beyond, was a realistic and beautiful one, and called forth loud applause, as also did the sluice-house scene, in which the flood- gates are opened, and the water rushes in, threatening to overwhelm the heroine. Mr Percy Kehoe’s fine orchestra again performed excellent music, and the whole performance must be considered a pronounced success.
     Alone in London will be repeated to-night and to-morrow night, which will be the last of the present season, as the Company will leave for Wellington on Thursday.



The Scotsman (6 March, 1894 - p. 5)


     MELODRAMA of the most sensational description occupies the boards of the Theatre Royal this week. “Alone in London” is now a familiar play. It has gone the rounds for six or seven years, and has had a very successful run for works of its kind. Mr Robert Buchanan, as the dramatist, and Miss Harriet Jay have produced a very effective piece, brimful of exciting and thrilling scenes. The plot is, however, most improbable, and realism is only secured by great exaggeration. The story is the familiar one of an innocent girl lured from her virtuous home by the traditional villain, and cast off in London to pursue her career as a flower-seller. The seamy side of life in the great Metropolis is painted in dark colours. Human nature, however, is hardly ever so black as this play makes it, and the authors have evidently sacrificed probability to realistic effect. The vices and virtues of certain classes are very strongly depicted, but the picture is much overdrawn. The lights and shades of the play are not at all balanced, and when one has to see vice triumphant, and howls of execration greeting its triumph till the close of the piece, with only one gleam of joy and brightness in a sad life, it cannot be said to be a pleasant piece, even though Mr Buchanan seeks in it to point a moral. Messrs Miller and Elliston’s company gave a very capable representation of the drama last night. The villain of the piece, Richard Redcliff, who has decoyed the innocent heroine to London and left her to struggle in the slums, was admirably personated by Mr Harrington Reynolds. If he erred at all, it was in interpreting too freely the brutal aspect of the character, his almost fiendish cruelty seeming at times to bring the gallery in practical touch with the stage. His partners in crime had capital representatives in Mr Frank Withers and Mr Percy Bell. Miss Ada Hollingsworth gave a good representation of the poor waif, Tom Chickweed, and the part of the little boy Paul was most naturally sustained by Master French. As the sorely- tried wife, Annie Meadows, Miss Nellie Fletcher was thoroughly sympathetic; Miss Rose Pelham rendered the little which was given to her, as Ruth Clifton, in a most pleasing manner; and Mrs Maloney, the good-natured Irishwoman, found an excellent exponent in Miss Lizzie Howe. As a pair of strolling players, Miss Beatrice Goodchild and Mr Henry Eglinton provided most of the amusement which served to brighten the play; and the part of the large-hearted, honest, and manly miller, John Biddlecombe, had, physically and dramatically, a most suitable representative in Mr W. H. Brougham. The mounting of the play was most effective. There was a crowded attendance in the cheaper parts of the house, and in these quarters the play was warmly appreciated.



Alone in London after the Olympic - continued

or back to Alone in London main menu








The Fleshly School Controversy
Buchanan and the Press
Buchanan and the Law


The Critical Response
Harriett Jay


Site Diary
Site Search