Play List:

1. The Rath Boys

2. The Witchfinder

3. A Madcap Prince

4. Corinne

5. The Queen of Connaught

6. The Nine Days’ Queen

7. The Mormons

8. The Shadow of the Sword

9. Lucy Brandon

10. Storm-Beaten

11. Lady Clare

[Flowers of the Forest]

12. A Sailor and His Lass

13. Bachelors

14. Constance

15. Lottie

16. Agnes

17. Alone in London

18. Sophia

19. Fascination

20. The Blue Bells of Scotland

21. Partners

22. Joseph’s Sweetheart

23. That Doctor Cupid

24. Angelina!

25. The Old Home

26. A Man’s Shadow

27. Theodora

28. Man and the Woman

29. Clarissa

30. Miss Tomboy

31. The Bride of Love

32. Sweet Nancy

33. The English Rose

34. The Struggle for Life

35. The Sixth Commandment

36. Marmion

37. The Gifted Lady

38. The Trumpet Call

39. Squire Kate

40. The White Rose

41. The Lights of Home

42. The Black Domino

43. The Piper of Hamelin

44. The Charlatan

45. Dick Sheridan

46. A Society Butterfly

47. Lady Gladys

48. The Strange Adventures of Miss Brown

49. The Romance of the Shopwalker

50. The Wanderer from Venus

51. The Mariners of England

52. Two Little Maids from School

53. When Knights Were Bold

___

Short Plays

Other Plays

Buchanan’s Theatrical Ventures in America

Poetry Readings

ROBERT WILLIAMS BUCHANAN (1841 - 1901)

Home
Biography
Bibliography

Poetry
Plays
Fiction

Essays
Reviews
Letters

The Fleshly School Controversy
Buchanan and the Press
Buchanan and the Law

The Critical Response
Harriett Jay
Miscellanea

Links
Site Diary
Site Search

THEATRE REVIEWS

22. Joseph’s Sweetheart (1888)

 

Joseph’s Sweetheart
by Robert Buchanan (adapted from the novel, Joseph Andrews by Henry Fielding).
London: Vaudeville Theatre. 8 March to 17 August, 1888. Followed by provincial tour.
London: Vaudeville Theatre. 24 September to 16 January, 1889. (260th performance).
Boston: Boston Museum. 25 March 1889.
London: Vaudeville Theatre. 28 November, 1889 to 10 January, 1890.

 

The Stage (2 March, 1888 - p.13)

     Titles of new plays are so frequently altered at the last moment that it is with a feeling of doubt that I mention that Robert Buchanan’s new play for the Vaudeville is called Joseph’s Sweetheart. By-the-bye, will not this name suggest to many who do not know the source of Buchanan’s plot the incident in the lives of Joseph and of Potiphar’s wife?

___

 

The Graphic (3 March, 1888)

   Joseph’s Sweetheart—such is the title which Mr. Robert Buchanan has given to his new comedy based on Fielding’s “Adventures of Joseph Andrews”—is in active preparation at the VAUDEVILLE. Its successive scenes, spread over five acts, will, it is expected, present many striking pictures of life and manners in the Hogathian days of King George II. Joseph’s “sweetheart” is, of course, Fanny. She will be played by the fascinating Miss Kate Rorke, who, by the way, is to marry, next summer, Mr. Gardiner, the popular actor who played the hero in Pleasure at Drury Lane. This is as it should be—that is to say, clever actresses should marry actors, and not peers of the realm and such haughty folk, who generally require them to forswear the stage. Here let us note that Mr. Thomas Thorne plays Parson Adams, Mr. Conway Joseph, Miss Eliza Johnstone Mrs. Slipslop, and Mr. F. Thorne Llewellyn—a character for whose introduction into the story Mr. Buchanan’s invention alone is responsible.

___

 

The Times (9 March, 1888 - p.10)

THE THEATRES.

VAUDEVILLE.

     Mr. Robert Buchanan’s second adaptation of Fielding, Joseph’s Sweetheart, was brought out at the Vaudeville yesterday afternoon and proved to be a worthy pendant to Sophia, whose success, in all probability, it will rival. As Sophia was a version of “Tom Jones,” so the present play tells the story of “Joseph Andrews,” with improvements suggested by the conditions of dramatic effect and also, we may add, by the improved tone of polite conversation. To quote an “author’s note” on the playbill, Joseph’s Sweetheart is “rather a play utilizing some of Fielding’s characters than a dramatization of Fielding’s story.” It is Mr. Robert Buchanan’s good fortune to have perceived great dramatic potentialities in a novel hitherto disdained by the adapter; and a more wholesome, more vigorous, more interesting, more enjoyable play than he has fashioned out of it the public could not wish to see. The success of yesterday’s performance was unequivocal. That fielding is no longer read by the masses is not a matter likely to affect the popularity of Joseph’s Sweetheart in the smallest degree. The spectator is not called upon to brush up his knowledge of the original in order to understand either the adapter’s characters or his situations. Clear and straightforward in construction, the play tells its own story, and its pulse, so to speak, beats throughout with a steady, healthy throb. As his mainspring of action Mr. Buchanan has given prominence to the jealous vindictiveness of Lady Booby toward Joseph Andrews and his rustic sweetheart, Fanny Goodwill, whose abduction by the scented dandy and libertine, Lord Fellamar, is planned and carried out at her instigation. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” Lady Booby gives a pointed illustration of the axiom. Her passion for her erstwhile lackey, who is subsequently found to be of aristocratic birth and who has spurned her advances, turns into a hate that knows no bounds. Her project of revenge being foiled, for the innocent Fanny is rescued from her ravisher’s clutches at a night fête in Ranelagh-gardens, she declines to accept the inevitable, and at the close of the fifth act, when the happiness of the lovers is assured, she leaves the stage cursing them. It is a terrible picture which is thus drawn of a jealous woman’s fury and implacability, and Miss Vane, who plays Lady Booby, does the fullest justice to it, aided as she is by a handsome and imposing presence. Lest invidious comparisons should be drawn, let us hasten to say that the play has been no less fortunate in obtaining the support of Mr. H. B. Conway as Joseph and Miss Kate Rorke as the persecuted Fanny. They make a noble pair of lovers, whose varying fortunes are followed with the most sympathetic interest. How little the theatrical public care, after all, for that alloy of the goodness of human nature so much affected by naturaliste writers! Joseph Andrews is all that is upright, brave, and loyal, Fanny Goodwill all that is faithful and devoted, and the spectacle of so much virtue sends the house into raptures.
     The character of Parson Adams, one of the best known in the whole range of the 18th century fiction, stands in the relation of an accessory to Mr. Buchanan’s dramatic scheme, but it is so closely interwoven with the action, and so admirably embodied by Mr. Thomas Thorne, as to be the most prominent of all. The quaint figure of the rustic, simple- minded cleric who is passing rich on something less than £40 a year is met with at every turn, and one of the prettiest scenes of the piece is a representation of his humble cottage with a glimpse of its domestic life. Parson Adams preaches peace, but the wrongs of the world cause him to brandish menacingly at frequent intervals the stout-knotted stick that he always carries. This character is one of Mr. Thorne’s most delightful creations, far superior in point of interest and artistic truth to his Partridge. The habit of the pulpit is strong upon the venerable divine, but under his clerical manner human nature peeps forth with the most refreshing effect. Among other characters entitled to rank as flesh and blood are Lord Fellamar by Mr. Cyril Maude, Mrs. Adams by Miss Gladys Homfrey, Gipsy Jim by Mr. J. S. Blythe, Sir George  Wilson, father of the long-lost Joseph, by Mr. William Rignold, Fellamar’s Welsh factotum Llewellyn ap Griffith by Mr. F. Thorne, and Mrs. Slipslop by Miss Eliza Johnstone. Most of the characters of the piece, indeed, exhibit a genuine kinship with humanity. It is curious to note that Mrs. Slipslop is the undoubted parent of Mrs. Malaprop, although her “derangement of epitaphs” is not perhaps quite so amusing. Considering the smallness of the stage of the Vaudeville wonders have been done in the way of scenic effect, particularly as regards the view of Ranelagh-gardens by night, where, by the way, the austere cleric falls into the hands of a bevy of enchanting damsels, greatly to his perplexity and alarm. Joseph’s Sweetheart is, on the whole, a stronger and better play than Sophia; it may suffer a little, however, in public estimation from being second in order.

___

 

The Morning Post (9 March, 1888 - p.5)

VAUDEVILLE THEATRE.
_____

     Mr. Robert Buchanan disclaims having attempted the dramatising of Fielding’s novel, “Joseph Andrews,” in the play which he submitted to the verdict of public favour yesterday afternoon. He acknowledges his indebtedness for the leading motives of his comedy, but he has not aspired to present in “Joseph’s Sweetheart” a close or thorough dramatic version of the original story, any more than in “Sophia”—brightest and best of his plays—did he pretend to give more than a broad treatment of certain incidents in “Tom Jones”. The play’s the thing, and as such it must be judged, and not upon its resemblance to Fielding’s fanciful tale. “Joseph’s Sweetheart” fulfils one of the chief, if not the highest, of a dramatist’s legitimate aspirations. If not a work of much merit in construction and literary skill, it succeeded yesterday in thoroughly pleasing the audience, and a great success was the result. Joseph is in the service of Lady Booby, whom he has unwittingly captivated by his personal grace and accomplishments. Being faithful to his sweetheart, Fanny Goodwill, the companion of his childhood under honest Parson Adams’s roof, he declines the advances of the woman of fashion whose lacquey fate has made him. In revenge for her repulse at the hands of the supposed menial, Lady Booby prompts her licentious friend, Lord Fellamar, to carry off Fanny to his town residence. The abduction is managed through the agency of a drunken chaplain, Llewellyn ap Griffith, who gains access to the rustic home of Parson Adams in the character of a publisher anxious to purchase that worthy’s sermons. The rascal, however, plays his master false, and, to settle scores over a richly-merited thrashing which Fellamar administered to him, he contrives Fanny’s escape by persuading her to accompany her persecutor to a fête at Ranelagh-gardens, where she is rescued an restored to her friends. Meanwhile Joseph has found a position in society, and a father in Sir George Wilson. A duel is fought, in which Lord Fellamar is worsted, and in some reparation of his conduct he clears Fanny’s character, and Lady Booby is finally defeated. The acting was throughout excellent. Mr. H. B. Conway was earnest and dignified as Joseph Andrews, and infused life and feeling into the part; and surely no more winning and graceful Fanny Goodwill could have been found than Miss Kate Rorke. Mr. Thomas Thorne gave a delightful picture of clerical simplicity and good heartedness in his genial old Parson Adams, with his humble surroundings, scholarly attainments, and self-denying generosity. Miss Eliza Johnstone was richly humorous as Mrs. Slipslop, the original type of Sheridan’s Mrs. Malaprop, and Mr. Frederick Thorne, Mr. Scott Buist, Mr. William Rignold, Mr. J. S. Blythe rendered valuable service as Llewellyn ap Griffith, Squire Booby, Sir George Wilson, and Gipsy Jim. Miss Vane is to be congratulated upon the conspicuous ability and judgment displayed in the very difficult and thankless part of Lady Booby, and Miss Gladys Homfreys made a kindly and comely matron as Mrs. Adams. A word must be said for the very beautiful scenery and rich dresses with which the play has been provided. Mr. Buchanan’s new comedy, with its pathetic story, its moving incidents, and its wealth of old-world luxury, portrayed in the silks and brocades, the powder and patches, the swords and ruffles of an age when dress was picturesque as society was vicious, is sure to attain popularity, and a long run is in store for “Joseph’s Sweetheart.” The pleasant old custom of speaking a prologue was revived last night by Miss Vane, in the character of Lady Booby.

josephphot1

[Cyril Maude as Lord Fellamar, Nellie Vane as Lady Booby, H.B. Conway as Joseph Andrews, Kate Rorke as Fanny Goodwill, William Rignold as Sir George Wilson, Thomas Thorne as Parson Adams, Gladys Homfrey as Mrs Adams, Frederick Thorne as Llewellyn ap Griffith and Eliza Johnstone as Mrs Slipslop in Joseph’s Sweetheart at the Vaudeville Theatre.]

josephphot2 josephphot4

[H B Conway and Kate Rorke as Joseph Andrews and Fanny Goodwill.]     [H.B. Conway, Kate Rorke and Thomas Thorne.]

josephphot3 josephphot11

[Fred Thorne as Llewellyn ap Griffith, H.B. Conway and Cyril Maude as Lord Fellamar.]             [Thomas Thorne and Kate Rorke.]

josephphot10
josephphot13 josephphot12

                             [Kate Rorke as Fanny Goodwill.]                                                                    [H B Conway as Joseph Andrews.]

josephphot5 josephphot7

                           [Thomas Thorne as Parson Adams.]                                                             [Gladys Homfrey as Mrs Adams.]

josephphot8 josephphot6

                     [William Rignold as Sir George Wilson.]                                                            [Kate Rorke as Fanny Goodwill.]

josephphot9

[Kate Rorke as Fanny Goodwill.]

josephprog1 josephprog2

[Playbill for Joseph’s Sweetheart at the Vaudeville Theatre.]

 

The Globe (9 March, 1888 - p.2)

     MR. ROBERT BUCHANAN and a few writers for the Press appear to have jumped a little too readily to the conclusion that Sheridan adapted his Mrs. Malaprop from Fielding’s Mrs. Slipslop. He may have done so, but it is impossible to be sure that he did. There was one Dogberry, the invention of one Shakespeare, whose “nice derangement of epitaphs” may well have suggested a female Dogberry both to Fielding and to Sheridan, whose Mrs. Malaprop, by the way, is an infinitely more humorous creature than the rather thin creation of Fielding.

_____

     A CORRESPONDENT writes:—“Unless mine ears deceived me, Parson Adams, at the Vaudeville yesterday, was guilty of a couple of anachronisms in his speech. He spoke of Barabbas as having been a publisher—which joke was made originally by Lord Byron; and he also had a reference to the fact that the pen is mightier than the sword—which remark is made by Richelieu in Lord Lytton’s play. And yet Parson Adams lived before either Lord Byron or Lord Lytton.”

___

 

The Era (10 March, 1888)

“JOSEPH’S SWEETHEART.”

A New Comedy-Drama, in Five Acts, by Robert Buchanan,
Founded on Fielding’s Novel “Joseph Andrews,”
Played for the First Time at the Vaudeville Theatre,
on Thursday Afternoon, March 8th, 1888.

Joseph Andrews       ... ... ...     Mr H. B. CONWAY
Sir George Wilson    ... ... ...     Mr WILLIAM RIGNOLD
Llewellyn ap Griffith      ... ...     Mr FREDERICK THORNE
Gipsy Jim                  ... ... ...     Mr J. S. BLYTHE
Squire Booby           ... ... ...    Mr SCOTT BUIST
Lord Fellamar          ... ... ...    Mr CYRIL MAUDE
Sir Harry Dapper     ... ... ...    Mr FRANK GILMORE
Parson Adams         ... ... ...    Mr THOMAS THORNE
Fanny Goodwill       ... ... ...    Miss KATE RORKE
Mrs Slipslop             ... ... ...     Miss ELIZA JOHNSTONE
Mrs Adams              ... ... ...     Miss GLADYS HOMFREY
Abe                          ... ... ...     Miss BOWMAN
Mrs Green                ... ... ...     Miss BESSIE HARRISON
Lady Spangle           ... ... ...    Miss GRACE ARNOLD
Lady Flutter             ... ... ...    Miss BANNISTER
Lady Booby             ... ... ...    Miss VANE
Lord Supple              ... ... ...     Mr SILVESTRE
Gamekeeper             ... ... ...    Mr AUSTIN
Constable                  ... ... ...     Mr WHEATMAN
Lord Fellamar’s Servant ... ...    Mr WILSON

     In attempting to find materials for a play in “Joseph Andrews,” in the same way as he successfully dealt with Sophia, Mr Buchanan set himself a second task much harder than his first. Having said so much with reference to the foundation of Joseph’s Sweetheart, we need not enter into any elaborate essays upon the origin of Mr Buchanan’s play. The question is, after all, not how much or how little the dramatist is indebted to Fielding, but at how much advantage he has invested his borrowings, and how he has arranged his own narrative. There is no suspicion of caricature about Mr Buchanan’s Joseph. He is a first-rate hero, muscular and admirable entirely, and his livery suits him excessively well. We find him in the first act in Lady Booby’s boudoir, and here he is wooed by that amorous dame, and his sweetheart Fanny is favourably “remarked” by that very fine gentleman Lord Fellamar. Lady Booby’s declaration is followed by Joseph’s rejection of her proposal of marriage, and an accusation by her against Joseph of his having grossly insulted her leads to his dismissal from her service. We find him, however, hale and hearty, in the second act, at Parson Adams’s cottage. Here Lord Fellamar’s Welsh chaplain and “creature,” Llewellyn ap Griffith, comes and, pretending to be a publisher anxious to buy Adams’s sermons, gets him out of the way, and assists Lord Fellamar to carry off Fanny. Joseph enters, and with the Parson’s assistance is beating down the ravishers when Griffith, to save his patron, stabs Andrews, who falls wounded, whilst Fanny is borne away. In the next act we find the wealthy Sir George Wilson in his lonely manor-house lamenting the loss of his only son, who was stolen away by gipsies when a mere child. A certain Gipsy Jim is brought up by the constables, and makes the restoration of Sir George’s lost offspring the price of his (Jim’s) release. Parson Adams arrives to seek shelter at the manor house, having been turned out of his living by its patron the revengeful Lady Booby; and after Joseph has been introduced and has vowed vengeance on Lord Fellamar, the gipsy returns and discloses the fact that Andrews is Sir George’s son. We are next taken to Lord Fellamar’s house, where Fanny is a prisoner.  Fellamar, in a fit of irritation, chastises Griffith, who, in retaliation, goes over to the enemy, and advises Fanny to ask Fellamar to take her to see Ranelagh, where he (Griffith) will arrange for her rescue. Thinking that she is yielding to his proposals, the peer consents; and in the last scene of the act we get to Ranelagh Gardens, where most of the principal characters arrive. Fellamar pursues Fanny into a kiosk, and locks the door. Joseph in the full pride of his gentlemanhood, enters, bursts down the door, and releases her. Fellamar’s friends gather round him with drawn swords; but they are confronted by Adams and Griffiths with his friends. Andrews strikes Fellamar, and dares him to a deadly combat, which takes place in the last act, but not coram populo, and Fellamar is wounded, Joseph being saved by the MSS. of Adams’s sermons being used to serve as a shield for his vitals. Fellamar acknowledges Fanny’s innocence, Lady Booby departs chagrined and defeated, the lovers are united, and Adams is presented by Sir George Wilson with a living of a hundred a year.
     The mounting of the piece was learned, lavish, and elaborate. Lady Booby’s boudoir in the first act was a literal reproduction of a well-known cartoon from the series of “Marriage à la Mode.” The exterior of Adams’s cottage, with its real thatch and glass, was a striking instance of the combination of actual construction with clever cloth and profile painting. Lord Fellamar’s room in the fourth act was carefully finished, though the insertion of a modern French picture on the chimney piece was a strange archæological error. Ranelagh Gardens was a bright and pretty set, and the tavern in which the last act was played, with its spits and dish-covers, was a model scene of its kind. The costumes, too, were picturesque, accurate, and appropriate. The only defect of the play is its lack of continuous and centralised interest. We are occasionally “switched” off the main line of the story into a siding, and there is also a good deal of dialogue which is redundant. Nor is it only words that might be dispensed with. The last act is unnecessary, and Joseph might just as well punish Lord Fellamar at the end of the fourth, so far as dramatic interest is concerned. Nevertheless, marvels have been worked ere now by judicious curtailment and revision; and the fresh purity of its tone, the dramatic nature of its stronger scenes, and the healthy humour and honest pathos which pervade the piece, make Joseph’s Sweetheart a charming and agreeable play.
     A better Joseph Andrews than Mr H. B. Conway it would be hard to find. With the sturdy frame and personal comeliness which account for the praises lavished upon Joseph by Lady Booby and Mrs Slipslop, he combined the dramatic experience and ability necessary for the depiction of the not very exacting character. Joseph has, in truth, little to do save to make love enthusiastically, and to be made love to with as good a grace as may be; and both of these functions Mr Conway performed admirably. Mr William Rignold’s solid and dignified style was well suited to the part of Sir George Wilson; and Mr Frederick Thorne looked the dissipated and subservient little Chaplain to the life, and reminded us strongly of the sketch of a similar personage in Thackeray’s own illustrations to “The Virginians.” Mr J. S. Blythe electrified the house by a sudden powerful burst of dramatic energy as Gipsy Jim, and his performance throughout was strikingly graphic and picturesque, both in make-up, attire, and general treatment. Mr Scott Buist, a meritorious actor, who has won his present position by indefatigable perseverance against somewhat discouraging beginnings, played Squire Booby cleverly and firmly throughout; and Mr Cyril Maude made an excellent Lord Fellamar, the mingling of the dandy and the libertine in the character being marked with commendable discretion and judgment. Mr Thomas Thorne had in Parson Adams one of those parts of which he possesses a kind of monopoly. The quaint absurdities and inconsistencies of the good pastor were so pleasantly commingled with the virtues of the man that the audience at once took Parson Adams into their personal friendship, and respected his goodness while they laughed at his oddity. To achieve such a result demands excellent art on the part of the actor, and Mr Thorne added another leaf to the laurels he has won in comedy by this excellent impersonation. There was no attempt to shirk the comic side of the character, but the serious passages were delivered with so much sincerity that flippancy was silenced and a reverence begotten which forbade ridicule; and event he spectacle of the Parson with a lobster-claw nose beset by a bevy of light ladies in Ranelagh failed to destroy the respect which Mr Thorne’s Adams had won. Miss Kate Rorke as Fanny Goodwill had only one strong scene, that in which Fanny is kept prisoner by Fellamar, and assisted by the Chaplain; but of this she made the very most, and was throughout a charming sample of a fresh, honest, affectionate country maiden. Miss Eliza Johnstone as Mrs Slipslop had a part which was replete with “fat,” and did not fail to take advantage of her many opportunities, making her Malapropisms with perfect naturalness; and Miss Gladys Homfrey was just the kind of woman one imagines the real Mrs Adams to have been. Last, but perhaps most important of all, we come to Miss Vane, who played Lady Booby. We have seldom seen a piece of acting so thoroughly satisfactory. From the earlier and lighter scenes, where the veneer of fashion yet covers Lady Booby’s real character, to the concluding exit, in which her nature is disclosed in all its moral ugliness, Miss Vane depicted through all its shades of feeling the infatuation of the fine lady as it gradually worked havoc in her disposition, and led her on from mere brazen audacity to jealousy, conspiracy, and heartless bitterness. A truer picture of a strongly marked type has not been seen on our stage for some time. That Miss Vane was no less of an adept at the delivery of rhymed verse than at that of prose was shown by her admirable  recitation, before the curtains separated at the commencement, of the following prologue:—

Ladies and Gentlemen,—Behold in me
A wicked dame of the last century,—
Just brought to life again before your gaze,
To hint the fashion of forgotten days,
When Garrick, bent to woo the comic Muse,
Changed the high buskin for soft satin shoes,
And frolicking behind the footlights, showed
Love à bon ton and marriage à la mode!
La, times are changed indeed since wits and lords
Swagger’d in square-cut powder’d wigs, and swords!
Picture the age!—A lord was then, I vow,
A lord indeed (how different from now!)
And trembling Virtue hid herself in fear
Before the naughty ogling of a peer.
Abductions, scandals, brawls, and dissipation,
Were rich men’s pleasure, poor men’s consternation,
While Fashion, painted, trick’d in fine brocade,
Turn’d Love to jest, and Life to masquerade!

Well, ’mid the masquerade, the pinchbeck show,
When Folly smiled on courtesan and beau,
Some noble human Spirits still drew breath,
And proved this world no hideous Dance of Death!
Sad Hogarth’s pencil limn’d the souls of men,
And Fielding wielded his magician’s pen!
Off fell the mask that darken’d and concealed
Life’s face, and Human Nature stood revealed!
Then rose Sophia, at Fielding’s conjuration,
Like Venus from the sea—of affectation;
Then madcap Tom showed in his sport and passion
A man’s a man for a’ that, spite the fashion;
Then Parson Adams, type of honest worth,
Born of the pure embrace of Love and Mirth,
Smiled in the English sunshine, proving clear
That one true heart is worth a world’s veneer!

And now our task is, in a merry play,
To summon up that time long past away;
To bring to life the manners long outworn,
The lords, the dames, the maidens all forlorn—
A tableau vivant of the tinsel age
Immortalised on the great Master’s page!
Hey, presto! See, I wave my conjurer’s cane!
The Present fades—the dead Past lives again—
The clouds of modern care dissolve—to show
Life à la mode a hundred years ago!

___

 

The Stage (16 March, 1888 - p.14)

VAUDEVILLE.

     On Thursday afternoon, March 8, 1888, was produced a new five-act comedy drama founded by Robert Buchanan upon Fielding’s novel “Joseph Andrews,” and entitled:—

Joseph’s Sweetheart.

Joseph Andrews     ... ... ...     Mr. H. B. Conway
Sir George Wilson  ... ... ...     Mr. William Rignold
Llewellyn ap Griffith    ... ...     Mr. Frederick Thorne
Gipsy Jim              ... ... ...    Mr. J. S. Blythe
Squire Booby         ... ... ...     Mr. Scott Buist
Lord Fellamar        ... ... ...     Mr. Cyril Maude
Sir Harry Dapper   ... ... ...     Mr. Frank Gilmore
Parson Adams       ... ... ...     Mr. Thomas Thorne
Fanny Goodwill     ... ... ...     Miss Kate Rorke
Mrs. Slipslop        ... ... ...    Miss Eliza Johnston
Mrs. Adams         ... ... ...    Miss Gladys Homfrey
Abe                      ... ... ...    Miss Bowman
Mrs. Green           ... ... ...    Miss Bessie Harrison
Lady Spangle       ... ... ...      Miss Grace Arnold
Lady Flutter         ... ... ...      Miss Bannister
Lady Booby         ... ... ...    Miss Vane
Lord Supple          ... ... ...     Mr. Silvestre
Gamekeeper         ... ... ...     Mr. Austin
Constable            ... ... ...    Mr. Wheatman
Servant                ... ... ...    Mr. Wilson

     In Joseph’s Sweetheart Mr. Buchanan has boldly and successfully dramatised a very ticklish story. Fielding’s novel is perhaps well known to our readers, and so we will merely skim over the incidents Mr. Buchanan has brought together for his play. Joseph Andrews is in the service of Lady Booby, who is so enamoured of her servant as to openly declare to him her unconquerable passion. On the other hand Joseph’s sweetheart, Fanny, has aroused the unlawful desires of Lord Fellamar, whose attentions to the poor girl are encouraged by Lady Booby for her own vile ends. Joseph spurns his mistress’s advances and so inflames her anger that she accuses him of making overtures to her. So poor Joseph is dismissed from her house. In Act 2 Joseph and his beloved Fanny are found in company with Parson Adams, to them enters Llewellyn ap Griffiths, Lord Fellamar’s chaplain. The latter, pretending that he is a publisher, offers the parson a large sum of money for his unpublished sermons, contrives to get him out of the way, and then, with the assistance of Lord Fellamar and his servants, carries off Fanny, but not before Joseph and the parson—who has re-entered—have given the scoundrels a sound thrashing. In the affray Joseph is wounded by Griffiths, and sinks to the ground as his beloved is borne off by her captors. In Act 3 we find Sir George Wilson in his manor house brooding over the past, and recalling sad memories of his dead wife and his lost son, who when a child has been stolen by gipsies. Gipsy Jim—who had formerly promised to stick to Joseph through thick and thin in return for some kindness shown him—now enters, brought in by constables. On condition that he is permitted to escape free he promises Sir George that his lost son shall be found. Act 4 shows us a room in the house of Lord Fellamar in which the Welsh chaplain Griffiths is recovered from a drunken stupor. Griffiths is assaulted by Fellamar, and in revenge swears to protect Fanny, who is a prisoner in Fellamar’s house. True to his word Griffiths manages Fanny’s escape by planning a ruse. Fanny is to accede to Fellamar’s desire to accompany him to Ranelagh Gardens without demur. Griffiths is to be on the spot, and with a few faithful followers is to secure her freedom from her would-be ravisher. This plan succeeds. Fellamar and Fanny visit Ranelagh Gardens. Here nearly all the characters are cleverly brought together by the dramatist. Fanny, heartbroken and despairing of relief, rushes madly from a gay throng of painted and shameless women into a wooden house, pursued by Fellamar. Griffiths calls together his band and is about to commence a rescue when Joseph appears. A scene between Fellamar and Joseph ends in the latter striking Fanny’s abductor and challenging him to a duel. In Act 5, a tavern near Lincoln’s Inn Fields, Fellamar’s second appears and questions the right of Joseph to fight with a gentleman. Sir George enters and declares Joseph to be a man of birth—his own son. Joseph goes off to fight Fellamar. The latter shortly after returns badly wounded, and asks forgiveness for the pain he has caused all. Joseph forgives him, and at the same time gives some well-timed advice to Lady Booby, who has come to gloat over what she thinks the ruin of Fanny and the defeat of the man she has so passionately admired. Thus Fanny and Joseph are once more united, and Parson Adams finds in Sir George a firm friend and patron. Despite a want of cohesiveness, Joseph’s Sweetheart is a cleverly contrived play—one that should bring in a rich harvest to the Vaudeville management, who on Friday placed it in their night bill. The piece is prettily staged, perhaps the most natural set ever seen upon the boards is the thatched cottage of Parson Adams—a delightfully rural looking structure, without the slightest sign of the stage carpenters’ or painters’  hands. The interiors, too, are all well designed and painted sets, reflecting the greatest credit on all concerned. Mr. Conway is to be congratulated upon his success as Joseph. He not only looks the part perfectly, but also plays it with much freshness and vigour, giving a picture that is almost inseparable from the play. Mr. Rignold is well suited as Sir George, of which part he gives a dignified and characteristic portrayal. Mr. Fred Thorne as the little backcrawler, the Welsh parson, looks and acts admirably, his fire-eating speeches being received with great laughter. A hit is made by  Mr. Blythe as the outcast, Gipsy Jim. His make-up and performance are equally good. Mr. Maude shows much skill and refinement as Lord Fellamar, and Mr. Buist as Squire Booby gives a most acceptable impersonation. Parson Adams, a dear old fellow, after the style of the Vicar of Wakefield, full of contentment and thankfulness for his present welfare, yet having enough of the old Adam in him to resent a blow with a blow, is capitally played by Mr. Thos. Thorne, who gives equal attention both to the serious and the comic side of the character. The most difficult character of Lady Booby is admirably enacted by clever Miss Vane. How many actresses could successfully portray this part without giving offence, we wonder. Miss Vane, like a true artiste, sinks all personal feeling, and depicts to the life the lustful and revengeful woman, who, unable to carry out her designs upon Joseph, seeks to destroy his happiness by blasting the fair fame of his loved one. A hateful character grandly played. Miss Johnstone as Mrs. Slipslop—another Mrs. Malaprop—appears to revel in the part. She gives her lines with a seeming unconsciousness that is most enjoyable. Another clever performance comes from Miss Homfrey as Mrs. Adams. A perfect picture of the old parson’s loving spouse is given by this actress, whose appearance is well suited to the character. Pretty Miss Rorke as Fanny looks charmingly and acts with much modesty and freshness of style, contributing a sketch of a dear little country maiden, such as we should imagine Fanny to be—gentle and affectionate.
     Before the play on its first production Miss Vane stepped in front of the curtain and admirably delivered the following prologue:—

[as above]

___

 

The Athenæum (17 March, 1888)

DRAMA
_____

THE WEEK.

     VAUDEVILLE.—‘Joseph’s Sweetheart,’ a Drama in Five
Acts, founded on Fielding’s ‘Joseph Andrews.’ By Robert
Buchanan.
    
OLYMPIC.—Revival of ‘Christina,’ a Drama in Four Acts.
By Percy Lynwood and Mark Ambient.
    
ROYALTY.—‘Le mariage de Figaro.’

     IF the ghost of the author of ‘The Temple Beau,’ ‘The Tragedy of Tragedies,’ and ‘The Intriguing Chambermaid’ is permitted to revisit “the glimpses of the moon,” and take an interest in mundane affairs, it must be a little disconcerted to see what a mine of wealth lay unexplored in the novels which it has been reserved for the present day to dramatize. With his power of characterization and his many other eminent gifts, Fielding might easily have given us the best dramas of his epoch. His plays were, however, as a rule, written in haste to serve a temporary purpose, and though they swell Fielding’s literary baggage do not rank beside his novels. The idea, meanwhile, that the ramblings of Partridge or the advances of Lady Booby could be fitted to the stage does not seem to have struck Fielding or any of his contemporaries or successors. To Mr. Buchanan belongs the credit of first seeing how much that is dramatic was buried in Fielding’s two masterpieces, and of turning it to profitable account. Joseph’s Sweetheart,’ as Mr. Buchanan calls his adaptation of ‘Joseph Andrews,’ is a brisker and more stimulating drama than ‘Sophia.’ It is a strong, rather roughly constructed  work, which appeals directly and forcibly to the sympathies. That it is representative of the great work out of which it is dug Mr. Buchanan will not claim. The judgment of the adapter is, indeed, best seen in the manner in which he has selected from the huge amount of matter at his disposal. Presenting us with a fresh and tender interest in the shape of the loves of Joseph Andrews and Fanny Goodwill, he has in the approved fashion placed it in the midst of a world of cynicism which serves it as an effective background. Lady Booby, to whom the troubles of the lovers are mainly due, is rather too fiendish to win acceptance. The other characters are, however, fresh and natural. Mr. Thorne’s company has had meanwhile a training in Fielding, and its success in dealing with the creations of the great novelist is creditable and even surprising. The pleasing qualities and eccentricities of Parson Adams are presented by Mr. Thomas Thorne with a moderation that is thoroughly artistic, and that never subsides into tameness. Mr. H. B. Conway is an admirable exponent of Joseph Andrews. Miss Kate Rorke is a winsome Fanny, and Mr. F. Thorne is a singularly fiery and entertaining Llewellyn ap Griffith. Exercising a conscientiousness eminently artistic and creditable, Miss Vane exhibits all the worst features of Lady Booby, one of the most thankless parts a woman has often been called upon to play. Not less well represented are the remaining characters, and the Lord Fellamar of Mr. Cyril Maude, the Squire Booby of Mr. Scott Buist, Mr. William Rignold’s Sir George Wilson, and Miss Eliza Johnstone’s Mrs. Slipslop prove satisfactory. Much care had been taken with the rehearsals, and the whole went with much spirit. Out of a microcosm such as is Parson Adams to extract a work so shapely and so effective as ‘Joseph’s Sweetheart’ is creditable to Mr. Buchanan, and to assign Fielding’s characters so much recognizable individuality is honourable to the manager. The piece will probably run for hundreds of nights. It is only to be hoped that familiarity with the parts will not lead the actors to degenerate into the farcical extravagance from which their present performance is free.

___

 

The Illustrated London News (17 March, 1888 - p.7)

THE PLAYHOUSES.

A few months ago there was a discussion about the condition of Henry Fielding’s grave in the Protestant cemetery at Lisbon. Some officious person wrote to the papers that it was shamefully neglected; but it all turned out to be ridiculously untrue, for the grave is of solid stone—ære perennius—and it is surrounded by flowering shrubs and mournful cypresses, and the English ladies who visit Lisbon never fail to scatter roses on the solid sarcophagus containing all that is left of the author of “Tom Jones” and “Joseph Andrews.” Mr. Robert Buchanan has just added one more flower of graceful literature to the author’s memory, for he has given us even a better play than “Sophia.” The Vaudeville ought to be crowded every night until the end of the season with audiences anxious to see and enjoy “Joseph’s Sweetheart.” Little did Fielding dream what a good play would be made out of his first story. As everyone knows, Fielding was a dramatist of considerable renown long before he dreamed of writing a novel, and his first venture was launched in order to vex Richardson and cast ridicule on his “Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded.’ Richardson was in the odour of sanctity, Fielding was a Bohemian; Richardson was among the elect of society, Fielding was out in the cold. But the righteous soul of Henry Fielding rebelled against all this sugary sentimentality and fatuous Phariseeism, so he resolved to imitate Cervantes, to give us a new Don Quixote, to immortalise his old friend and scholar the Rev. William Young, and to sketch a lusty handsome footman who should resist temptation, whether it came from mistress or maid, and who should have as much real virtue as a dozen Pamelas. The bare idea of dramatising “Joseph Andrews” seemed to the uninitiated even more daring that that of giving us a stage version of “Tom Jones.” But there is nothing succeeds like success, and encouragement has given heart to Mr. Buchanan’s work. We get the outlines of the story very fairly presented, and the chief characters very adequately sketched. It is distinctly unfair to say that Fielding has suffered at the hands of the dramatist. We cannot get his incomparable language, or the whole fruit of his satire; but we certainly do get his humanity, his fresh breezy nature, his virility, and his English spirit, which, after all these years, puts to shame the mawkish stuff of the female satirists of to-day—women who occupy the stage with so-called society dramas, and who, when they do not poison, add to the discontent and indifferentism that check the healthier aspirations of the young. If we do not get Fielding pure and simple, we get a breath of him. We are no longer taken to stuffy divorce courts, or to unwholesome boudoirs, or to the orgies of the drunken and the dissolute; but away we go to the sunny cottage of Parson Adams, that affords so pleasant a contrast to the Hogarthian home of Lady Booby. The temptation of the immaculate Joseph by his indolent, scheming mistress; the proud boy’s banishment to his country home; the scheme of the defeated woman to ruin Fanny Goodwill in order to revenge herself on her honourable lover; the abduction of Fanny; the discovery of the wealthy father of Joseph, now no longer a servant; the rescue of Joseph’s sweetheart from the snares of a libertine; the duel between Andrews and Lord Fellamar, and the subsequent reconciliation—all these incidents are dovetailed into the scheme of the drama with remarkable skill, and make up a play of singular interest. And who shall say that we do not get a speaking likeness of our old friends in the Parson Adams of Mr. Thorne, the Lady Booby of Miss Vane, the Joseph of Mr. H. B. Conway, the Fanny of Miss Kate Rorke—all of them performances of conspicuous merit. There is no better comedy-acting to be found than in this cast. Parson Adams, with his gentle heart and veiled pugnacity, his keen sense of honour and love of Æschylus, his beneficent charity and comical absence of mind, is made a lifelike creation by Mr. Thomas Thorne, whose recent advance as an actor is very remarkable. In the long gallery of his successful personations—Caleb Deecie, Tom Pinch, old Partridge, and the rest—the new Parson Adams will take a very prominent position, for it is firmly drawn and painted in brilliant and lasting colours. Miss Vane is also to be congratulated on her nice artistic sense and bold handling of Lady Booby—a most difficult character to play, and one that requires immense tact to steer to success. Mr. Conway and Miss Rorke make a delightful pair of lovers, free wholly from mawkish sentimentality and both as bright and breezy as the downs from which they come, in the characters of Joseph and his sweetheart. A strong bit of sound dramatic character-acting comes from Mr. J. S. Blythe, who plays Gipsy Jim, a scamp who eventually proves the correct birth and parentage of Joseph. Mr. Blythe has the voice and manner of Mr. Fernandez, and some of his electric force as well. Other excellent assistance comes from Mr. F. Thorne, Mr. Scott Buist, and Mr. Cyril Maude, who gives a very clever sketch of a man of fashion under the Georges. How Thackeray would have liked to see this wholesome play, which is enjoyable in itself, and a wholesome antidote to much that is false and foolish elsewhere!

___

 

The Academy (24 March, 1888 - p.212)

THE STAGE.

THE COMEDY AT THE VAUDEVILLE AND
“THE BLOT ON THE ’SCUTCHEON.”

IN presenting an adaptation of Joseph Andrews at the Vaudeville, Mr. Buchanan takes occasion to refer to the success of his version of Tom Jones, and to say that that proved how unnecessary it is, in dramatising the great masters, “to preserve the coarseness of their period as well as the humanity of their genius.” The sentence is neatly turned, and it expresses one side of the truth. Mr. Buchanan, when he deals with Fielding, does preserve, I think, “the humanity of his genius.” That inspires Mr. Buchanan to write acceptable and genial, if sometimes ill-constructed, plays; but Mr. Buchanan does not in the strict sense “dramatise” Fielding at all. Nor could Fielding, in the strict sense, be dramatised without the retention of a great deal of what Mr. Buchanan condemns as coarseness. The fact is, Fielding was a very penetrating student of human nature. Fielding actually wrote what Thackeray declared no modern novelist would dare to write—the history of the average young man. Hence a certain element of coarseness, a certain plainness of speech, which, in the treatment of the novelist by Mr. Buchanan, must be at once got rid of. If Mr. Buchanan’s pieces pose as substantially accurate stage versions of rollicking and powerful eighteenth-century fiction, I hold them to pose unwarrantably. But if they assert themselves only as engaging “variations” on a theme which a great master has supplied—and especially as variations suitable to the day, and suitable to the requirements of Mr. Thorne and an always competent company—I accept them cheerfully, as such. Nay, notwithstanding here and there a common repartee and inappropriate retort, I think them, on the whole, very dexterous and agreeable playwright’s work, inasmuch as they do bring upon the stage effectively nearly all of Fielding’s characters that can properly be brought there. The last of them affords opportunity for a thorough stage realisation, not of the book indeed, but of Parson Adams, of his wife, and of the young woman in whom he shows so legitimate an interest. Joseph Andrews himself is not quite so adequately presented by the dramatist, because he is deprived of at least one important motive for action. He is not tempted as his sister Pamela was. And Lady Booby, as Mr. Buchanan conceives her, is unnatural and inconsequent. Had it occurred to her to propose marriage to Joseph, it would not have occurred to her, on his refusal, to charge him with violence. That could only have been the act of the Lady Booby whom Fielding, and not Mr. Buchanan, imagined—a Lady Booby gross and ungoverned: a Potiphar’s wife.
     One makes these qualifications—these reservations—in one’s approval; but, that being done, it is easy to express, likewise, the pleasure and interest which the piece affords. I do not inquire further, too closely, into the ingredients of the dish. The dish is palatable, and looks well at table, or, to put it in other words, the play sustains its interest; the evening is occupied pleasantly; scenery and stage arrangement of these old-world characters are alike excellent; and the acting, which is never seriously amiss, is, as regards certain players, quite without fault. Every kind of physical advantage has been bestowed on Mr. Conway. He can be hearty with grace; he is sympathetic and chivalrous. Yet he is not a perfect, though he is, no doubt, a fascinating Joseph Andrews. He wants naïveté. He is honest and brave; but he is not absolutely simple. Now, the Lady Booby who, in Mr. Buchanan’s rendering of the story, “importunes” Joseph “with love in honourable fashion,” and makes many tenders of her affection towards him—and afterwards gives proof of her innate vulgarity and inconceivable spite—is represented skilfully, and with discretion, by Miss Vane, who is seen far better in the part of one who deems herself fascinating than she was some weeks ago in the part of one who is really found to be so. The method of Miss Eliza Johnstone—who comes for the nonce from Toole’s Theatre—is wont to be pungent. She plays well as that maid of Lady Booby who was the true ancestress of Mrs. Malaprop. Miss Homfreys—large and matronly, domestic and smiling, dressed neat and clean in quiet browns and sober tea-greens—realises, in appearance at least, Mrs. Adams to the life. Miss Kate Rorke is Fanny. This young artist was so successful as Sophia, and so admirable in “Heart of Hearts,” that much has come to be expected of her. She is deservedly a playgoer’s favourite. Fanny, however, does not give her quite such opportunities as were found in the other two plays. As it is, Miss Rorke makes Fanny impulsive and ingenuous, natural and charming, though she cannot make her very varied. The cleverest thing in her performance is the inexplicable flavour of rusticity with which, from beginning to end, she contrives to endow it. Hers is undoubtedly a dramatic temperament. Mr. William Rignold is almost needlessly sententious as Sir George Wilson—of whom Joseph Andrews is the long-lost son; but Mr. Rignold, whatever his mannerisms, must, at all events, have the credit of suggesting a man with a sorrow. Mr. Royce Carleton would have played Gipsy Jim more powerfully than the present performer of the part; but the part, after all, is a small one. Mr. Scott Buist does well as Squire Booby; and Mr. Cyril Maude most excellently well as the graceless Lord Fellamer, who, at the instigation of Lady Booby, carries off the screaming fair. Mr. Frederick Thorne gives us a good bit of character-acting as Llewellyn-ap-Griffith. His make-up is excellent; his face very curiously Welsh. I have kept Mr. Thomas Thorne’s Parson Adams to the last, because it is distinctly the most finished performance in the play. Few of the parts played by a manager who has never been unduly ambitious have allowed him to be so very varied; few have been filled by him with such significant and telling, yet always delicate, details. And, unlike more than one actor of acquired position, Mr. Thorne scarcely ever introduces a detail that may not belong to the picture. Thus, in his performances, the effect remains broad and true, though the touches by which it is obtained are many and intricate. Throughout the play we have the sense of the very presence of Fielding’s good parson; a picture of Adams, placid of countenance, benign of gesture, with his long white bands and his rusty cassock—a man so human that he was wont indeed to be “filled with ale,” and was now and then ecstatic in condition at the sight of a game pie—but so domestic that he preferred his ale at home, “however sour,” “to any vintage of Falerno.”

___

 

The Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News (31 March, 1888 - p.19)

OUR CAPTIOUS CRITIC.

capcritjothmb

Lloyd’s Weekly London Newspaper (1 April, 1888 - p.5)

PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS.
_____

VAUDEVILLE THEATRE.

     Mr. Robert Buchanan has contrived in Joseph’s Sweetheart an interesting love story, which is unfolded in an exciting way. The likeness of the play to Fielding’s romance is very faint, though the same period has been chosen. Joseph Andrews is a handsome young retainer of a fashionable lady, who, captivated by his personal graces, makes him a flattering proposal of marriage in unmistakeable terms. Pretty Fanny Goodwill, Joseph’s sweetheart, is in the house at the moment, and little wonder if the young gentleman proves true to his plighted troth, and declines the proferred honour. He is driven from the house on a false charge by his infuriated mistress, but seeks the kindly shelter of the roof of Parson Adams. The worthy clergyman’s cottage gives Mr. Perkis opportunity for one of the most fascinating country scenes imaginable. Amid roses and sunshine Fanny and Joseph vow to be ever true, despite all Lady Booby’s scheming. The licentious Lord Fellamar, however, intervenes, and readily complies with Lady Booby’s suggestion to carry off Fanny to London. A quaint little Welsh chaplain, a creature of the nobleman’s, is set to lure Parson Adams away, and chiefly through his action the abduction of Fanny is effected, Joseph being struck down by a cowardly sword-thrust. Poor and weak, Joseph and the faithful clergyman start on an almost hopeless journey in pursuit. On the way they meet kind friends, and fate ordains that the true story of Joseph’s birth shall be made known, a gipsy discovering the secret that he is son to the wealthy Sir George Wilson. Thus, with money and powerful influence, Joseph arrives in the metropolis at the moment that Fanny is saved by the timely repentance or rage of the Welsh chaplain, who turns a traitor to his patron in consequence of having received a sound and not unmerited thrashing. In a capitally contrived scene of Ranelagh gardens, Fanny is rescued at the sword’s point, and with a duel in which love proves victorious the play ceases. Miss Kate Rorke is the most winsome of heroines; she is graceful and girlish, and yet in the trying tearful scenes of the play singularly impressive and powerful. Mr. H. B. Conway has been the lover, but on Monday we found Mr. Frank Gilmore, a handsome young gentleman of some promise, playing the part. A droll picture of the somewhat bellicose Parson Adams is given by Mr. Thomas Thorne, and his whimsicalities, and particularly his learning keep the audience in a continual roar of laughter. Mr. Frederick Thorne hits off the peculiarities of a Welshman with much success, and Mr. Cyril Maude is the lord, and Miss Vane the vengeful Lady Booby. Much care has been bestowed upon the mounting, and Joseph’s Sweetheart is no doubt destined to rival Sophia in popularity.

josephdrawing

[Illustration from The Theatre (2 April, 1888).]

 

The Theatre (2 April, 1888)

“JOSEPH’S SWEETHEART.”

New Comedy Drama, in five acts, by ROBERT BUCHANAN, founded on FIELDING’S novel, “Joseph Andrews.”
First produced at the Vaudeville Theatre, Thursday afternoon, March 8, 1888.

Joseph Andrews     ...    Mr. H. B. Conway
Sir George Wilson  ...    Mr. William Rignold
Llewellyn ap Griffith ...    Mr. Frederick Thorne
Gipsy Jim                ...     Mr. J. S. Blythe
Squire Booby         ...    Mr. Scott Buist
Lord Fellamar        ...    Mr. Cyril Maude
Sir Harry Dapper   ...    Mr. Frank Gilmore
Parson Adams       ...    Mr. Thomas Thorne

Fanny Goodwill ...    Miss Kate Rorke
Mrs. Slipslop      ...     Miss Eliza Johnstone
Mrs. Adams       ...     Miss Gladys Homfreys
Abe                    ...     Miss Bowman
Mrs. Green         ...     Miss Bessie Harrison
Lady Spangle     ...    Miss Grace Arnold
Lady Flutter       ...    Miss Banister
Lady Booby       ...    Miss Vane

     Mr. Buchanan has taken his idea from Fielding’s novel, but without sacrificing for a moment the spirit of the work, he has written a play which may to all intents be called original, and one that, from its hearty nature, admirable construction, and its polished dialogue, may be considered as one of the best that has been produced for some years. The author has been careful to make the hero a manly fellow, protected against the wiles of other women by the honest love he bears for a young country girl, not a sanctimonious milksop. The enamoured lady of fashion, too, may almost be forgiven her passion in consequence of its object being of such a noble nature; and in the country parson we have a being who is all charity and kindliness, showing some of the weaknesses of the old Adam in his not hesitating to call to his aid his good blackthorn stick when requisite, with a spice of dry humour, and a natural human weakness for believing that his sermons have only to be seen by a publisher to be at once purchased and printed; and in the telling of his story Mr. Buchanan has faithfully reproduced the characters and scenes of a hundred years ago. The play opens in Lady Booby’s tiring room, where we find her surrounded by exquisites and ladies of fashion. Joseph, her handsome man-servant, has inspired her with love, as he has also her maid, Mrs. Slipslop, but he will have none of either. The great lady, finding her advances repulsed, at once summons her servants and accuses Joseph of insulting and trying to kiss her, and his immediate dismissal is the more disgraceful from the fact of the accusation having been made in the presence of his sweetheart, Fanny Goodwill, who has been brought up to town by Parson Adams. These two, however, will not believe that he can be capable ot such conduct, although the nobility of his mind prevents him from casting the blame on his late mistress, and so these three journey back to the country parsonage, where they are welcomed by the buxom and good-hearted Mrs. Adams. And here poor Fanny’s troubles commence, for Lady Booby has set on Lord Fellamar, a dissolute nobleman, who has been struck with the innocent country girl’s charms, to carry her off, and this is done through the agency of his chaplain, Llewellyn ap Griffith, a choleric, bibulous Welshman. With the help of his lordship’s servants, and despite the resistance of Parson Adams and her lover, who is wounded in the struggle, Fanny is borne away. In the next act we find Sir George Wilson, a rich country gentleman, lamenting the fact of his having no one to succeed him, his infant boy having been stolen from him many years before. Presently Gipsy Jim is brought before him on a charge of poaching. To save himself from punishment the gipsy admits that he carried off the baronet’s son, and promises for a reward, and if he is let off scot-free, that he will produce him. At this time Parson Adams and Joseph appear on the scene, faint and weary on their journey in pursuit of Fanny, who they have learnt has been taken to London. Gipsy Jim reveals Joseph to be the boy whom he stole, and he is at once taken to his father’s arms. The scene shifts to Lord Fellamar’s house, where Fanny is kept a prisoner. The chaplain having offended his noble patron is struck by him, and determines on revenge; he therefore induces Fanny to temporise with Lord Fellamar, and, pretending to listen to his protestations, induce him to take her to Ranelagh, where the chaplain says he will find means to rescue her. And so she is taken to the Gardens, and there the chaplain, with a band of Welsh gentlemen, aids Joseph and Parson Adams, who have tracked her here, to beat off her persecutor and his companions, Lord Fellamar consenting to meet Joseph, now recognised as Sir Joseph Wilson’s son. The meeting takes place, and Joseph overcomes his antagonist, notwithstanding the latter’s skill in fencing, the nobleman having sufficient grace left in him to regret the part he has been playing, and to declare that Fanny is as pure as when he first saw her, and that Lady Booby has incited him to try and make her his victim. The play might easily have concluded with the fourth act, the fifth being taken up by a very tender love scene between Joseph and Fanny, in which he tells her that he must fight, and to bring him good luck in the encounter he carries with him Parson Adams’s manuscript sermons and places them next his heart, and they really save him from receiving a fatal wound, though for him to have placed them there was scarcely a.chivalrous proceeding. Mr. Conway was the beau ideal of the character he represented—handsome, manly, and natural, with plenty of animation and deep tenderness, he succeeded admirably. He had a charming and most sympathetic sweetheart in Miss Kate Rorke, so innocent and gentle was she in her love; yet in her scene with Lord Fellamar rising to strong dramatic power. Such a contrast to her was the Lady Booby of Miss  Vane, worldly and conscious of her beauty, depraved and determined, and with no innate sense of shame, and yet so glossed over with the courtly manner of the woman of fashion that the repulsiveness of her overtures was almost hidden. Her acting throughout of a most difficult character was worthy of the very highest praise. Though Parson Adams resembles Partridge in some of his characteristics, Mr. Thomas Thorne has made of the kind-hearted country clergyman a different study. He has instilled into it more firmness and decision, and there is a change in the humour, but the charity and simplicity of his disposition are ever apparent. I think the representation might have been a little strengthened had the Parson not been quite so ready to cudgel evil-doers. Mr. William Rignold was a dignified Sir George Wilson, and his sorrow for the loss of his son was expressed in manly fashion. Mr. Frederick Thorne was excellent as the choleric Welshman. Mr. J. S. Blythe was picturesque and vigorous as the poacher, Gipsy Jim. Mr. Cyril Maude as the foppish roué, Lord Fellamar, gave another proof of how rapidly he is rising in his profession. Miss Eliza Johnstone as Mrs. Slipslop delivered her Malaprop-Iike perversions of speech with delightful unconsciousness, and Miss Gladys Homfrey and Mr. Scott Buist, Mr. Frank Gilmore and Miss Grace Arnold rendered valuable assistance. The scenery throughout was good; the exterior of Adams’s cottage, a solidly-built set, being one of the best that has been seen. Lady Booby’s boudoir is a capital reproduction of one of Hogarth’s pictures. “Joseph’s Sweetheart” was a decided success, and was put in the evening bill on Friday, March 9.
     The following prologue, written by the author, was excellently delivered by Miss Vane:—

[as above]

                                                                                                                                           CECIL HOWARD.

___

 

The Morning Post (3 April, 1888 - p.3)

VAUDEVILLE.

     Mr. Robert Buchanan’s charming play, “Joseph’s Sweetheart,” has firmly established itself in popular favour. His free, but skilful, treatment of Fielding’s novel has produced a comedy that may well rank in point of merit with “Sophia;” and so prosperous is the career of the new piece that no further attraction was required to fill the theatre twice yesterday to its utmost capacity. Quite to the taste of the spectators was the manly, sympathetic acting of Mr. H. B. Conway, who resumed his part of Joseph after a recent indisposition. Miss Kate Rorke showed great tenderness and grace as his faithful “sweetheart,” and Mr. Thomas Thorne worked with hearty good-will as the simple self-denying Parson Adams. The beauty of the scenery and the richness of the dresses were much admired, especially in the fête at Ranelagh.

_____

 

Joseph’s Sweetheart - continued

 

Home
Biography
Bibliography

 

Poetry
Plays
Fiction

 

Essays
Reviews
Letters

 

The Fleshly School Controversy
Buchanan and the Press
Buchanan and the Law

 

The Critical Response
Harriett Jay
Miscellanea

 

Links
Site Diary
Site Search